Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Thu, 10 August 2017 03:15 UTC
Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DFD132533 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:15:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Uhh8hXQq9m5 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74A9A132529 for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 20:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54DEF24AE13; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:13:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5117160042; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DFF1600A3; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id mDLtzitE9V1H; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E6F4160042; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:13:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC5081EE5DB; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:13:34 +1000 (AEST)
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, art@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net> <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy> <0ce197ca-64ee-bbcf-0c42-779996742113@nostrum.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 09 Aug 2017 21:52:10 -0500." <0ce197ca-64ee-bbcf-0c42-779996742113@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 13:13:34 +1000
Message-Id: <20170810031334.DDC5081EE5DB@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/AJuJwa6bTWrd9nDWGFNz4zLnqh8>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 03:15:05 -0000
In message <0ce197ca-64ee-bbcf-0c42-779996742113@nostrum.com>, Adam Roach write s: > On 8/9/17 6:36 PM, John R Levine wrote: > > See rfc3588 which has some _sctp names for NAPTR records. > > > I presume you're referring to the example in Appendix B? I can see how > it might look like that on first glance, but a careful parsing of what's > there shows that the only reason it looks like that is because there's > been some formatting damage. The literal text that's there is: > > ;; order pref flags service regexp replacement > IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "AAA+D2S" "" > _diameter._sctp.example.com IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "AAA+D2T" > "" _aaa._tcp.example.com > > This is accompanied with an explanation that there are two NAPTR records > present (one for AAA+D2S and one for AAA+D2T). I suppose you're reading > the second line of this text to say "the host > _diameter._sctp.example.com has an NAPTR record for 'AAA+D2T', with an > empty regexp and a replacement of '_aaa._tcp.example.com" > > Aside from that being kind of nonsense, I'll note that the *first* > record (if this "_diameter._sctp.example.com" string is part of the > second record) has no replacement value -- which clearly doesn't work. > > The only way this makes sense is if you read the first record as: > > IN NAPTR 50 50 "s" "AAA+D2S" "" _diameter._sctp.example.com > > ...and the second record as: > > IN NAPTR 100 50 "s" "AAA+D2T" "" _aaa._tcp.example.com > > ...at which point it becomes clear that the underscores are only in the > "replacement" field, and not used as input for NAPTR. > > I'll file an erratum. > > /a While you are reporting the NAPTR records the formatting the SRV records is also poorly presented. Line breaks and indenting is critical. ;; Priority Weight Port Target IN SRV 0 1 5060 server1.example.com IN SRV 0 2 5060 server2.example.com should be ;; Priority Weight Port Target IN SRV 0 1 5060 server1.example.com IN SRV 0 2 5060 server2.example.com Personally I would have had the owner names there as well but I didn't write this document. > _______________________________________________ > art mailing list > art@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@isc.org
- [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf tjw ietf
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Cullen Jennings
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John C Klensin
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf John R Levine
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Dave Crocker
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Adam Roach
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Mark Andrews
- Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf Tim Wicinski