[art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 25 July 2017 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCC6131CD0; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaBW_ydqVpHQ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1556F1317B1; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t201so48301896wmt.1; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c3tcKycGl4IIMFMcnhbLx5i1fC/oUYQ5jB4ZY9U+fsg=; b=pIrcM7a0bizU+lRl77lr1wlsUus2wOcQarL9RJV80YafmT7uGjWRt+ogGlh+bUsbTj xLYl4FQPL6LfMvQowZRpScmK5SP4ZsN4wCbaWhBzJdjxtIw5Go9gZx/1K+ilKsMYtQWJ AyMthsTCU5S+ktog68w7mJCGSrNxzKE4jOl1X+Ue7Y/OJR5ocg8077kJ8NdM+sG28SMt C9uNU2hM5FP88GnfXwA5aU7glvxM5io0CI5BnH3mErKtX/dsdSjtmgSy4DxrNW2aMImt V98ojPBPuCJGcSGkJX8gfM0hNvWYqZKl77/dLEwAIufdgayHQg+lDVzkEqZZ26qqSxfT +K8g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=c3tcKycGl4IIMFMcnhbLx5i1fC/oUYQ5jB4ZY9U+fsg=; b=RpOdeJ6pBB55hfe0npOdDydj8oePYdhjFrim9m0Qd/y2DbovTuJRXREopqSp0UICBI GWsjtZhCpUVdxMZxVTZwRVo/0f90SegKwGGODG6McrKrZ5e2ISaTfnStRQN593Jtiq7t kX/AffAsPqFfRnFNCo6+Li6YqW5ke3UL5YmmBLk2u3b/XW/KGdDoP2a7//GRL0y0pVys MISOZC6apuN5rwmmW4adInWnXJy6fKJB39AeMnLOocu0FLrx23atHJPzN1lIy/ILZOLB imcp3OfVTyDdYhN99a8+GCzJv36GTxYisvBIYCvy6XO2uYBl+qKjdY1WsNxRzc7fV1S2 XFdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113bZLLgKjfEI8rjJfELH7csTDphbtDT7swuZv9RPwB4U3nOojDR lNcCnrbbGuyLEOhgskuvqmnzge9EEW4u
X-Received: by 10.28.33.67 with SMTP id h64mr7867435wmh.87.1500994567485; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.152.139 with HTTP; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:56:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 10:56:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+HiVOz1zrhNeEYnzy4hryrhFu+v5GNWqcXdOqQBeB9Cig@mail.gmail.com>
To: art@ietf.org
Cc: "dnsop-chairs@ietf.org" <dnsop-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113d78ba0158f60555258883"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/_xEN0xCI80-ufnSfBieFyKu8fpE>
Subject: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 14:56:12 -0000

Application Folks

We in DNSOP have a draft that is formalizing the use of _underscore labels
in DNS, and the creation of a "DNS Global Underscore Scoped Entry
Registry".   We want the application folks to give us some comments, as we
feel we are fairly  close to Working Group Last Call.

The draft is here:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf/

and I'll be glad to shepherd feedback toward the author, or bring them here
if it becomes quite contentious.

thanks

tim/suzanne
DNSOP chairs