IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Thu, 03 August 2017 00:46 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808C21287A5 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=tX8V7xPG; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Wr7a7jkS
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lkyxq6sRQzuY for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (www.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 111C31275FD for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Aug 2017 17:46:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 58214 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2017 00:46:54 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e363.5982727e.k1707; bh=Y8j5MBM1k6NE40W4ID0emE2xJxZogt6urYEP0notn/s=; b=tX8V7xPGMudjSGNfOxjOr0UwML0jkujq8nlmxK0VomL4BUwzF/SwnDya2CjLaVKWr/oELWY9VN7TYG0lHtitMEICa23OTaF0FO3ZBdgn2WAbQHBjOrdG2feFa8K0PmWCqAcXU+4qNgIMGs+qGXGnruoe8/+yUKTHzxOYHVjuUq7Ra797Ew14w5QaJltIOnq13RhMYXIClQTKzldrBYKj21Z4RWrO5QIBDYLbxYeX7bi7/MhvW8oco3wQk+0d16Rn
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=e363.5982727e.k1707; bh=Y8j5MBM1k6NE40W4ID0emE2xJxZogt6urYEP0notn/s=; b=Wr7a7jkSmqMXTSw1eliMCaxwpwJ3msIfVB90ub+7GOguzFB0a519sl14ThZcq6cElMpmD/quvjwg8A9pVlw30u++7zllyPQUR6qahlALlcgOvzOpSWdVhteVGPVyuRwIETCeNI6fVUYV4ZFM4C0vgJFo4JF/Zry0m8pMvrhuPKQDoJ+b5cqin4kA9L9MC1ote1FeGj72s6U6kKEGHIAgxPiTa1/k+qlTVUry1xnHtYtb4FHnj/MlO4EWlAqlaZLm
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 03 Aug 2017 00:46:54 -0000
Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2017 20:46:54 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708022044070.18538@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Cc: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/_zsKzl7JNQ73CW5WFzVUiRWYyyY>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2017 00:46:57 -0000

On Wed, 2 Aug 2017, Dave Crocker wrote:
> Same approach as for SRV.  Shift to use the underscore registry.  My 
> understanding is that URI has little adoption, so even if the result is some 
> usage changes, that might not be intolerable.

It is my impression that you can count the number of prtocols used in SRV 
records on the fingers of one hand, and the number of enumservice types 
that people actually use on the fingers of the other, so that's probably 
workable.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email