IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7603131C99 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=DzPGZ39n; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=Ir4srPzx
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pXE-11iKfg1B for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85AFF120724 for <art@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 17:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2874 invoked from network); 1 Aug 2017 00:15:37 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b38.597fc829.k1707; bh=gPaVNc8AMrAYOcsrvyNyrFU8NFXpP/Fm+Fcc16++6QE=; b=DzPGZ39nf9zp5y+nd+UEPXEjxSXW+7By5v0w25Q7R1dusUZ9CJXQAg6PWanXYQS4O3SV3mbMeymTqV95JfTRMCXKfzxX+6SaJIUccq3UocXB57ChDUe+at7PdWdZ0DdQCknz8Eau0+67MTlAOX2ViV4t8nTfvt1SuihoYCkN55Ni2oQSaRbV85KeogHYEd5M8DwJOWRVt6HoL63rdo8WRABXaI5WrIScOX64SRuFkhdb9B6h441jUaWUBIyAzNov
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=b38.597fc829.k1707; bh=gPaVNc8AMrAYOcsrvyNyrFU8NFXpP/Fm+Fcc16++6QE=; b=Ir4srPzxG4wiW23AW9qrRBGl0VF7SWbw30UvQMC8n9w3VYkKOUFCHyBoDiAFu+qKXB+FBawAEpa6jnu61T221V30hHLpAR9u5BZxAs/M9MZq1L2LhnFoVIZWIq3Plb/9QcCEYXmBA6E2WC+oEjXdDoej6br7KKYMk1O0w66DZZ8YEfDRDZoqoEbcmZn1KAfepil8c5a42DdFSCYdU7II02+XC9nBBdXmRnVJon8duo0EueuPzE76SN26HQSl/3Oa
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 01 Aug 2017 00:15:37 -0000
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:15:36 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707312014160.13516@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
Cc: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20170731040745.57C0C806E75D@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20170728183000.26378.qmail@ary.lan> <cb9476d4-50ac-f311-2249-e3caf3266d01@nostrum.com> <20170731040745.57C0C806E75D@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/RVZwImTMK25yQXpvqglKIUhfNAw>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 00:15:40 -0000

On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Mark Andrews wrote:
> SRV records are ONLY to be use for protocols that specify that they
> be looked up.  There are generic proceedures for how to select a
> server given that SRV records are permitted in the first place.

Sorry, but I don't see what your point is.

I think that Adam and I agree that none of the services in the 
port/service registry should be listed here, and only the transports that 
are used for registered services.

We are not saying anything about what services use SRV.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email