IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Wed, 09 August 2017 23:37 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115DD1287A5 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=lpMhUoBL; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=pCkPjRxH
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4_STT68kzL4T for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D567131CCC for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 40641 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2017 23:36:56 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=9ebf.598b9c98.k1707; bh=WvmH7bKPBLbnbhyVg26n5PT2uZjYYZKudgri4u6YC9E=; b=lpMhUoBLj2WvthHH+MQtl6+Yol0shhOEF+o/LPNRi28g673+5fjvUwP74Dokho+ThWcd5Xc9h1ctcluAOkW5+v1WAKGgbzaKNQmR8gRCBHwbWxsJuS8LI1kYP94J76OlwuW3jZ0wkBagytZ+a7zc30heZC48c7a0HOjBsZ0nbA/VDhF9epzl4ACrqU7xpsVNPdZBchFWWOrdRvNK8qZsqPi2w4OD4uxx8DepbjI9VToNOYvsE9CIWBHnacdF0Usl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=9ebf.598b9c98.k1707; bh=WvmH7bKPBLbnbhyVg26n5PT2uZjYYZKudgri4u6YC9E=; b=pCkPjRxHz4b3soGg8DeMg2sZws0Vjp+bgGoyIvPA4QRt68gR5XnMtslzc+hPAEXBhnTlCH0cXidlHTkLe1mbQRswe0jMZC0z71PHgzin3Vy3/0S0HksOep7PofQ+csy2Mz9HOOK+bolQa4zj3NWd9uz8R6biQzda1mNMhsKuYlKHCMVjnRGUQq/WLjV0N2wpohis9tx8ld2YnO6FYyF3jLdkEdZmA+Q+jyYipIsD76zX8Amlfnorg5IZDEQjACyH
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 09 Aug 2017 23:36:56 -0000
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 19:36:55 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net> <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/pwHfvQVqmr2NC5IJxC40yR9gFwQ>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 23:37:00 -0000

On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, Adam Roach wrote:
> That would appear to call for a slightly more narrow scope than the current 
> document, which claims to be registering underscore usage for SRV, TXT, and 
> URI RRs as well as (and I don't quite get this) NAPTR RRs. ...

See rfc3588 which has some _sctp names for NAPTR records.

> I would recommend documenting and registering the underscore leaf nodes used 
> by TXT records as a completely separate concern and in a different IANA table

That would rather defeat the purpose here, since the goal is to identify 
and ideally prevent name collisions.  Or are you saying that names for TXT 
and for SRV or URI are separate namespaces?

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email