IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Fri, 28 July 2017 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63EC131CC0; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.881
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.881 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cdmg5aA94nVq; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56F67131CBF; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 09:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v6SGI5hW099021 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:18:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>, tjw ietf <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org, dnsop-chairs@ietf.org, dnsops@ietf.org
References: <CADyWQ+HiVOz1zrhNeEYnzy4hryrhFu+v5GNWqcXdOqQBeB9Cig@mail.gmail.com> <43437154-AD8C-4041-86B7-A33F8A5F15CC@iii.ca> <27C709A8477170E52D8F48E1@PSB>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <4a8635c1-c89b-7cb9-31db-e069d54980f8@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 11:18:00 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <27C709A8477170E52D8F48E1@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/bDZqinabpZ00TEtJVj_ksMi_ZYI>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:18:11 -0000

On 7/28/17 11:12 AM, John C Klensin wrote:
> I don't have an opinion as to whether it is
> appropriate for this particular draft, just that we should not
> abandon the concept of recognizing work by other standards
> bodies in their area of expertise because of a perception that
> it doesn't work.  It has worked in a number of important cases
> and continues to do so.


This would imply that an update to RFC8126 is in order.

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email