IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

"John R Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sat, 29 July 2017 14:40 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@taugh.com>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DB5127B73 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 07:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=iecc.com header.b=MRncuj67; dkim=pass (1536-bit key) header.d=taugh.com header.b=dWaRk4/u
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1TiMT0DaXj2 for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (w6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::4945:4343]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D121317C1 for <art@ietf.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 2017 07:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 99768 invoked from network); 29 Jul 2017 14:40:02 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=185b6.597c9e42.k1707; bh=YkiYyQg/BTfsXOLi3EoKt5UARnLlMQHrgvY7tCVIvFA=; b=MRncuj67UPNrzW9kBsuO+Py6iIlbFY15oj2rxz0o0lbLm6mjuayGVYO8yyZuaG/KyR7k5ZJxbOI0npMIyvcnSuYTgo/a6j5o300vOeN8Cg1lB9BFnLnzdrytEoBJgtJCQybfFsNNNG8n0nTMbtdqvGrG5XrMvlNOqh9rs3TDjep9oGj9C+D07BBA3JyRiVdFD9ugA6htCWpEoNU3D/ShPpf5xE0nPsFf3NabPM8++uz6312zm5lCJD1djIJJwfR9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=185b6.597c9e42.k1707; bh=YkiYyQg/BTfsXOLi3EoKt5UARnLlMQHrgvY7tCVIvFA=; b=dWaRk4/uKQwFceYK+Mm8m7NITMN5wMq77OhY0f/Zcf5Qpu7nt0mIwNcGUUsid/x+FUyUYIVcyo102Dm1W5nRr0++c/99WqMVL7nN6lM5Ay286Y4QNle4A11EAwZn4xzqIGFsJ3CjalzYwdGcPWFa1O0xBDVqXgOhoFZF07c6PXL1xnK9ejkumx7YTChcJXciY4Af2NLXnBospW8HIRQA0PiX0/X9s009p74te+par1So5nQ2ocdhm0nDfJv2IGEQ
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.2/X.509/AEAD) via TCP6; 29 Jul 2017 14:40:01 -0000
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 10:40:01 -0400
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1707291038450.8453@ary.local>
From: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: art@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <cb9476d4-50ac-f311-2249-e3caf3266d01@nostrum.com>
References: <20170728183000.26378.qmail@ary.lan> <cb9476d4-50ac-f311-2249-e3caf3266d01@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.21 (OSX 202 2017-01-01)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/YqxAIARbMBmJ7un-oCRa4Gve4PE>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:40:05 -0000

On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, Adam Roach wrote:
> In that case, it would appear that the main action here would be to clean up 
> the SRV entries in Table 1 -- by my understanding, the way RFC2782 is 
> written, the only registered SRV entries in the registry this document 
> establishes should consist of some strict subset of 
> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/protocol-numbers/protocol-numbers.xml>.

Right, the protocols that appear in the proto column of the services 
table, but none of the services.  This should make the draft considerably 
shorter.

There's still the URI enumservice issue.

Regards,
John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email