Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf

Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> Wed, 09 August 2017 23:46 UTC

Return-Path: <marka@isc.org>
X-Original-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: art@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E9C131CFE for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:46:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wJEIzCWmKezJ for <art@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ams1.isc.org (mx.ams1.isc.org [199.6.1.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 368C2126C2F for <art@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 16:46:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (zmx1.isc.org [149.20.0.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.ams1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7119E24AE12; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91D8160041; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5981600A3; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zmx1.isc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmx1.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id YHTuUvzF6gqS; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (c27-253-115-14.carlnfd2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [27.253.115.14]) by zmx1.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4F0C1160041; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 23:44:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rock.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by rock.dv.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE6481E236C; Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:44:36 +1000 (AEST)
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Cc: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, art@ietf.org, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
From: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <20170803003526.2349.qmail@ary.lan> <8cbaba50-a7d8-94b1-8cd0-fa8310e0b17d@bbiw.net> <47fcd0be-e4b6-2efc-266a-2eaef6243346@nostrum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy>
In-reply-to: Your message of "09 Aug 2017 19:36:55 -0400." <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:44:36 +1000
Message-Id: <20170809234436.8FE6481E236C@rock.dv.isc.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/ESNRdIBjRYiyVQcRx5zwGVdoHa8>
Subject: Re: [art] draft-ietf-dnsop-attrleaf
X-BeenThere: art@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications and Real-Time Area Discussion <art.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/art/>
List-Post: <mailto:art@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art>, <mailto:art-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 23:46:05 -0000

In message <alpine.OSX.2.21.1708091935040.35501@ary.qy>, "John R Levine" writes:
> On Wed, 9 Aug 2017, Adam Roach wrote:
> > That would appear to call for a slightly more narrow scope than the current 
> > document, which claims to be registering underscore usage for SRV, TXT, and 
> > URI RRs as well as (and I don't quite get this) NAPTR RRs. ...
> 
> See rfc3588 which has some _sctp names for NAPTR records.
> 
> > I would recommend documenting and registering the underscore leaf nodes used 
> > by TXT records as a completely separate concern and in a different IANA table
> 
> That would rather defeat the purpose here, since the goal is to identify 
> and ideally prevent name collisions.  Or are you saying that names for TXT 
> and for SRV or URI are separate namespaces?

Unless you have non-overlapping syntax rules they can't be seperate
namespaces.  As long as they both have a single prefix underscore
they are both in the same namespace.

> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
> Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
> 
> _______________________________________________
> art mailing list
> art@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/art
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka@isc.org