IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 21 August 2020 22:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE86D3A1406 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LbPCr5-rtNJE for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7398F3A1405 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723EB38A20; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:34:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ndCvn0O1_h_e; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C0438A1F; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:34:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BEB1AA; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:55:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, "asdf@ietf.org" <asdf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <C6381306-4C92-4E72-BB4B-853533592CA0@tzi.org>
References: <5C210025-34B4-45BC-9A1D-66D9E92B339A@tzi.org> <31064.1596838037@localhost> <C5ADCAAD-A2DE-47EB-87AA-D5D946E606AA@tzi.org> <9820.1597842659@localhost> <7E929A80-66E0-456E-89D4-922181686C3C@tzi.org> <D4CD7523-3318-4E33-A9EC-5528BBE8B50C@tzi.org> <18914.1597886637@localhost> <9B5FDA18-E7C0-4E16-B9DD-7BC00B087EDC@tzi.org> <CE29AEB1-CB01-42AA-96E0-60E52A7737E0@ericsson.com> <E320979F-8C31-4572-82A2-8F32984F948E@tzi.org> <MWHPR11MB18387E2635D6D74DF8854430D25A0@MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <26400.1598031282@localhost> <C6381306-4C92-4E72-BB4B-853533592CA0@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:55:03 -0400
Message-ID: <2195.1598050503@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/H6YevOQLlGzzfmBjKxCBxq5S8Zs>
Subject: Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:55:07 -0000

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
    > On 2020-08-21, at 19:34, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
    >>
    >> I think that we need some additional text around the proposed idea to call
    >> Implementation Drafts.

    > In the charter?

    > Being the lazy Bremen citizen I am [1], I now tried to steal from the
    > HTTPBIS and QUIC charters here.  Nothing about that in the charter.
    > Could that be a mode of operation that the WG decides, without formal
    > IESG agreement?

I'm thinking that it fits into the initial milestones.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email