IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 24 August 2020 05:26 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C913A0A36 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovXl47jHUhqM for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70A993A0A2D for <asdf@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Aug 2020 22:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.102] (p5089ae91.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.174.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4BZgbN3ddVzyTd; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:26:40 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <10564.1598217738@localhost>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 07:26:40 +0200
Cc: "asdf@ietf.org" <asdf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 619939600.083158-54c913ca76921f3c1c3b50a79fc2078d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <0809D764-4ECE-4EFF-AD3B-2C71E7F42D05@tzi.org>
References: <5C210025-34B4-45BC-9A1D-66D9E92B339A@tzi.org> <31064.1596838037@localhost> <C5ADCAAD-A2DE-47EB-87AA-D5D946E606AA@tzi.org> <9820.1597842659@localhost> <7E929A80-66E0-456E-89D4-922181686C3C@tzi.org> <D4CD7523-3318-4E33-A9EC-5528BBE8B50C@tzi.org> <18914.1597886637@localhost> <9B5FDA18-E7C0-4E16-B9DD-7BC00B087EDC@tzi.org> <CE29AEB1-CB01-42AA-96E0-60E52A7737E0@ericsson.com> <E320979F-8C31-4572-82A2-8F32984F948E@tzi.org> <MWHPR11MB18387E2635D6D74DF8854430D25A0@MWHPR11MB1838.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <26400.1598031282@localhost> <C6381306-4C92-4E72-BB4B-853533592CA0@tzi.org> <2195.1598050503@localhost> <88E71F97-7B67-424C-A721-D023F137B279@tzi.org> <10564.1598217738@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/wKbwb6CmMTHAF1z6e_1SBLgHQgg>
Subject: Re: [Asdf] Kicking off ASDF
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 05:26:45 -0000

>    CB> The plan is to evolve the specification in a regular rhythm, with a
>    CB> new Implementation Draft available about bi-monthly.
> 
>    CB> * SDF specification ("SDF 1.0"), WG document adopted, September 2020
>    CB> * SDF specification ("SDF 1.1"), Implementation Draft, November 2020
>    CB> * SDF specification ("SDF 1.2"), Implementation Draft, February 2020
>    CB> * (continuing in the rhythm...)
>    CB> * SDF specification ("SDF 1.n"), PS to IESG, September 2021
> 
> So, in that rhythm (~3 months), it would be:
>    1.3     May 2021
>    1.4     Sept 2021, PS to IESG
> ??

Well, bi-monthly is not tri-monthly.  I tried to refrain from prognosticating the exact version number we’ll go to IESG with, but if we manage to keep up the rhythm, it would be 1.6.  (I actually think it is more likely that we’ll slow down at the end when getting asymptotic.)

.oOo.

Michael has approved the pull request, any other takers?
I think this is the last thing we need to do before submitting the proposed charter.

Approve (or comment) at:
https://github.com/one-data-model/ietf108/pull/7

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email