[Asrg] Consent Proposal

gep2@terabites.com Fri, 27 June 2003 05:31 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA05771 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5R5VFC08663 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:15 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19VlpL-0002Fe-MP for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:15 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA05760; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19VlpI-0001Qa-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19VlpD-0001QX-00; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:07 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vlp7-0002Be-4V; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vloz-00028m-Hc for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:30:53 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA05733 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:30:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: gep2@terabites.com
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19Vloh-0001QN-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:30:35 -0400
Received: from h008.c000.snv.cp.net ([209.228.32.72] helo=c000.snv.cp.net) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 19VloW-0001Q8-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:30:24 -0400
Received: (cpmta 28405 invoked from network); 26 Jun 2003 22:29:58 -0700
Received: from 12.239.18.238 (HELO WinProxy.anywhere) by smtp.terabites.com (209.228.32.72) with SMTP; 26 Jun 2003 22:29:58 -0700
X-Sent: 27 Jun 2003 05:29:58 GMT
Received: from 192.168.0.30 by 192.168.0.1 (WinProxy); Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:28:25 -0600
Received: from 192.168.0.240 (unverified [192.168.0.240]) by nts1.terabites.com (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id <B0000024281@nts1.terabites.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:55:55 -0500
Message-ID: <B0000024281@nts1.terabites.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Asrg] Consent Proposal
To: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailer: SPRY Mail Version: 04.00.06.17
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:55:55 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> I would like to provide a generic proposal for consent-based system as per 
charter:

> 1. Users and/or ISP define rules and filters to filter incoming email. 
Rules/filters are decided by end users and ISPs, and are not mandated. 
Every user/ISP can define its own policies ranging from banning all email 
not digitally signed to blocking HTML.

I'd like to make sure that those rules can be specified differently for any 
given sender... and, for that matter, any given destination E-mail address,  so 
you can give specific rights to some senders (who need those for the kind of 
things I expect to receive from them) while denying those same rights to other 
senders.  Right can be extended on a strict "need to send/trust to send" basis.

For example, many of us have several E-mail addresses (or even catch-all 
accounts) and I might wish a given sender to be able to send something to me 
under one of my "hats" that I might not accept from them (or indeed ANYBODY 
maybe) when I'm wearing a different hat.

> 2. For each email user, the MUA or the ISP maintains a whitelist of trusted 
senders, blacklist of blocked senders and a graylist of unknown senders. 
Whitelisted senders go the inbox, graylisted senders go to the bulk folder, 
and blacklisted senders are either in the spam folder or erased.

Again, there needs to be different privilege levels specifiable for different 
sender/destination address pairs. 

Gordon Peterson                  http://personal.terabites.com/
1977-2002  Twenty-fifth anniversary year of Local Area Networking!
Support the Anti-SPAM Amendment!  Join at http://www.cauce.org/
12/19/98: Partisan Republicans scornfully ignore the voters they "represent".
12/09/00: the date the Republican Party took down democracy in America.



_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg