IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] Consent Proposal

"Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com> Sat, 28 June 2003 15:16 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25027 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:16:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5SFFDF10236 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:13 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WHQ1-0002f1-5z for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:13 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA25005; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WHQ0-0003dp-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:12 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WHPu-0003df-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:06 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WHPp-0002bp-Qn; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:15:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WHPK-0002bV-7G for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:14:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA24990 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WHPJ-0003dV-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:14:29 -0400
Received: from argon.connect.org.uk ([193.110.243.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WHP8-0003dN-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 11:14:18 -0400
Received: from mmail by argon.connect.org.uk with local (connectmail/exim) id 19WHOU-0005xe-00; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:13:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20030628035417.F2360@m433>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] Consent Proposal
To: Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
From: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: [ConnectMail 3.5.7]
X-connectmail-Originating-IP: 158.152.118.31
Message-Id: <E19WHOU-0005xe-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 16:13:38 +0100

> 
> > 6. Whitelists, graylists and blacklists are stored hashed or encrypted
> > to protect privacy.
> 
>   That may generate a misleading warm fuzzy feeling, but it's useless.
> A traffic log of your emails will show what you accept/reject.
> 

Walter, I've said this before, I'll say it again (no doubt) - There is an
important difference here: Traffic logs MAY preserve this information, and
of course many organisations (and many jurisdictions) have retention
policy. These anti-spam systems MUST preserve it (for some "long" time) and
so need to build-in provisions for security / privacy.




--

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email