[Asrg] Consent Proposal

"Mark McCarron" <markmccarron_itt@hotmail.com> Mon, 30 June 2003 01:23 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12442 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5U1NGj26930 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:16 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WnO0-00070G-JA for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:16 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12432; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WnNx-0001SC-00; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:13 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WnNs-0001S4-00; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:08 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WnNl-0006ts-Ce; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:23:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19WnN4-0006rv-O2 for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:22:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA12423 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:22:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WnMn-0001R7-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:22:01 -0400
Received: from bay8-f9.bay8.hotmail.com ([64.4.27.9] helo=hotmail.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19WnMc-0001QC-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 21:21:50 -0400
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 29 Jun 2003 18:20:55 -0700
Received: from 62.252.128.5 by by8fd.bay8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:20:55 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [62.252.128.5]
X-Originating-Email: [markmccarron_itt@hotmail.com]
From: Mark McCarron <markmccarron_itt@hotmail.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Subject: [Asrg] Consent Proposal
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <BAY8-F9ioWwr2UAaTzv00010b53@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2003 01:20:55.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[DAA26E70:01C33EA5]
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 01:20:55 +0000

Yakov,

This system is very similar, in fact almost identical, to the current one 
employed by Hotmail.  It is not effective in eliminating spam, the end user 
still recieves it and has to deal with it.  Also, it does not address the 
main issue about spam and that is the roughly 30% band-width absorbed across 
the Internet by it.  All this seems to do is sort it at the recieving end.

I also read something about a confirmation being sent back from the server, 
this is just an adaptation of challange response.

It also does not address the issue of spammer's who use their own mail 
servers.
Can you clear any of these problems up?

Mark McCarron.


> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:research@solidmatrix.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:23 AM
> > > > > To: asrg@ietf.org
> > > > > Subject: [Asrg] Consent Proposal
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to provide a generic proposal for
> > > consent-based system
> > > > > as per
> > > > > charter:
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. Users and/or ISP define rules and filters to=20
>filter incoming=20
> > > > > email. Rules/filters are decided by end users and ISPs,
> > > and are not
> > > > > mandated.
> > > > > Every user/ISP can define its own policies ranging=20
>from banning=20
> > > > > all email not digitally signed to blocking HTML.
> > > > > 2. For each email user, the MUA or the ISP maintains a
> > > > > whitelist of trusted
> > > > > senders, blacklist of blocked senders and a graylist of
> > > > > unknown senders.
> > > > > Whitelisted senders go the inbox, graylisted senders go to
> > > > > the bulk folder,
> > > > > and blacklisted senders are either in the spam folder or
> > > > > erased. 3. Whitelists are not only a list of email addresses
> > > > > of trusted senders,
> > > > > but to avoid sender spoofing also have additional features
> > > > > such as digital
> > > > > signatures, certificates, passwords, tokens, etc.
> > > > > 4. Additional automatic whitelist rules are defined as such
> > > > > email from
> > > > > trusted senders (e.g. Habeas) is automatically goes to the
> > > > > inbox unless
> > > > > blacklisted, etc. C/R systems are also integrated and upon
> > > > > receiving a
> > > > > positive response automatically whitelist the sender.
> > > > > 5. Additional automatic blacklist rules are defined such as
> > > > > email coming
> > > > > from known open relays is blocked.
> > > > > 6. Whitelists, graylists and blacklists are stored hashed or
> > > > > encrypted to
> > > > > protect privacy.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yakov

_________________________________________________________________
Use MSN Messenger to send music and pics to your friends 
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger


_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg