Re: [auth48] Amelia, Ben, Nick (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505 <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review)

[Michael A <[e-mail]>]

Michael Aaron - approved.

On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 10:24 AM Mallory Knodel <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Dear co-authors,
>
> Please can you review these late stage publication changes and let the RFC
> Editor know whether you are fine with them?
>
> Many thanks,
> -Mallory
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 01:17, Alice Russo <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>> Joseph,
>>
>> From this side, no open questions. The Doc Shepherd approval is
>> considered complete on the Section 5.1.1 question because the sentence was
>> updated as Shivan suggested ('Iran' was removed).
>>
>> The files are here:
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.txt
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.pdf
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.xml
>>
>> This diff shows only the most recent changes:
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-lastdiff.html
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-lastrfcdiff.html (side by
>> side)
>>
>> This diff shows all changes from the Internet-Draft:
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-diff.html
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>
>> We await any further changes -- and approvals -- from each author before
>> continuing the publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of
>> your document:
>>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9505
>>
>> Thank you.
>> RFC Editor/ar
>>
>> > On Nov 1, 2023, at 3:00 PM, Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[e-mail]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > That appears to be the same, good find!
>> >
>> > All, I'm going on vacation starting tomorrow until the following
>> Tuesday and I'll find some time on the planes involved to resolve as many
>> of these that are outstanding. I'm hoping we can then quickly get all
>> author sign-offs.
>> >
>> > --
>> > JLH, Internet Society, [e-mail] ( https://josephhall.org/ )
>> > From: Mallory Knodel <[e-mail]>
>> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 18:34
>> > To: Alice Russo <[e-mail]>
>> > Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall <
>> [e-mail]>; [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]<[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
>> [e-mail]<[e-mail]>
>> > Subject: Re: [Doc Shepherd] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505
>> <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sorry for the top post. I was browsing this Sandvine research doc that
>> is not the 2014 citation (this is from 2015) but presumably it contains
>> what was originally cited?
>> >
>> >
>> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nirmala-Svsg/post/Anybody-working-on-Internet-traffic-classification/attachment/59d63a5779197b807799782d/AS%3A405810988503040%401473764287142/download/traffic-classification-identifying-and-measuring-internet-traffic.pdf
>> >
>> > Joe I think it was from and early version of the draft so you could
>> tell us if this document could replace the original.
>> >
>> > -M
>>
>