Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505 <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review

Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org> Mon, 30 October 2023 14:09 UTC

Return-Path: <mknodel@cdt.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1637C15155A for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cdt.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9ecY9P4jfvBF for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C191C151070 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf2e.google.com with SMTP id 6a1803df08f44-6707401e1edso14835306d6.1 for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cdt.org; s=google; t=1698674981; x=1699279781; darn=rfc-editor.org; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=hh3zCoB27Y477SNzf5I0vgDc6s4Ynhu6jXYjClqC4Cs=; b=r5c6F8lZqpa9hxJ8P5ewwqjvldCmFqbtkadK3SHrbf6eEOXsUpXui542gi8i4ZOENX xxyyhmlECrwoAiBopRRjlCUIJ0W4utV0AGwXicNL2UMBqvaVmSYjgm6wy+9dYZu769gD 92kABWzCZ4aVWc1Df4aGR6Pd2f1ajFkydF+kQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698674981; x=1699279781; h=in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to:content-language:subject :user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hh3zCoB27Y477SNzf5I0vgDc6s4Ynhu6jXYjClqC4Cs=; b=hHAREDFWgriv3wV/VwCe2DP25qDWyxIqMoSuJ4Xsxp5vqgVfKQR9ZgABIvFt/S6kov RndGLKeoDvgCpRfXf1onP+KRdorSVgXlTWm8JC4CpvHmvM1HYU5amAvltqypa63w5ejR 5Idt+ee9i1KJEWlLXMu6+IpacMKxWuHNV6T3nzpHmu6TQjr6WJu155d/N7kooVxatZ/5 gr9wxyBxi1gPfu0izANV9QSAD+Q9MMA1IatCLeH/bzIly9xazuPpYRR4nFAZe5EFSFlI +tr7YtZ5wH5LXHwc/4Tk9uXk06Zq+dtgxD0jk6+diJdQNovZzuV8QR1b0TVwoVfOV4Ow ZVdw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy2Ef7M/NQAGi6xWwRrkmCkoesAYk5XzgcJl5vfeTeMNDfCC+Qt rfsA+qPevs5SxzDDFAQOh0YqVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGCz+yJIS6L1Yaeg7q/asd7L7cgbiJIzE70kEljUIXLADP7lZkIMRsa/KtH/womXap/cRaK5g==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:20ce:b0:66d:9e52:a431 with SMTP id 14-20020a05621420ce00b0066d9e52a431mr15794362qve.3.1698674981250; Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPV6:2600:4040:2529:4a00:29e1:63d6:e665:9e52? ([2600:4040:2529:4a00:29e1:63d6:e665:9e52]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a3-20020a0ccdc3000000b0064f3b0d0143sm3397431qvn.142.2023.10.30.07.09.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Oct 2023 07:09:40 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------8BIZ13goA5DZ0PEt0KGYQY2q"
Message-ID: <886ecf65-0e49-4515-837a-40129bc613ee@cdt.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 10:09:38 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Content-Language: en-US
To: "Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall" <hall@isoc.org>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "michael.drew.aaron@gmail.com" <michael.drew.aaron@gmail.com>, "amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc" <amelia.ietf@andersdotter.cc>, "ben.jones.irtf@gmail.com" <ben.jones.irtf@gmail.com>, "feamster@uchicago.edu" <feamster@uchicago.edu>
Cc: "irsg@irtf.org" <irsg@irtf.org>, "shivankaulsahib@gmail.com" <shivankaulsahib@gmail.com>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20231028003417.30010B33A7@rfcpa.amsl.com> <MN2PR06MB63029F6D5C825F68E0183205B1A1A@MN2PR06MB6302.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From: Mallory Knodel <mknodel@cdt.org>
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR06MB63029F6D5C825F68E0183205B1A1A@MN2PR06MB6302.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/ZOFrVIrpyrhQ6fHT4oz9zB9JWSc>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505 <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2023 14:09:46 -0000

Hi all,

I agree with all of the changes unless mentioned below. Thanks Joe and 
Editors!

More:

On 10/30/23 9:49 AM, Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall wrote:
>> Also, we suggest rephrasing the preceding sentence if the "instead"
>> phrase should not include "for a limited period of time".
>>
>> Original:
>>     Trade offs: DDoS is an appealing mechanism when a censor would like
>>     to prevent all access to undesirable content, instead of only
>>     preventing access in their region for a limited period of time.  The
>>     latter is really the only uniquely beneficial feature for DDoS as a
>>     technique employed for censorship.
>>
>> Perhaps (where text needs to be provided):
>>     Trade-offs: DDoS is an appealing mechanism when a censor would like
>>     to prevent all access (not just regional access) to undesirable content
>>     for a limited period of time.  ___ is a unique feature
>>     of DDoS as a technique employed for censorship.
>> -->
> I would suggest just deleting that sentence ("The latter is really the only uniquely beneficial feature for DDoS as a technique employed for censorship.")
I would suggest keeping it, but changing the last sentence to read: 
"Temporal impermanence is really the only uniquely beneficial feature 
for DDoS as a technique employed for censorship."
>> b) Please provide a replacement URL. This one is 404 Not Found.
>>
>> Original:
>>     [Sandvine-2014]
>>                Sandvine, "Technology Showcase on Traffic Classification:
>>                Why Measurements and Freeform Policy Matter", 2014,
>>                <https://www.sandvine.com/downloads/general/technology/
>>                sandvine-technology-showcases/sandvine-technology-
>>                showcase-traffic-classification.pdf>.
> This no longer seems to be available.

There are several links that no longer work, but I'm only commenting 
here-- would it be possible to try to find them on the Internet Archive?

-Mallory

-- 
Mallory Knodel
CTO :: Center for Democracy and Technology
newsletter ::https://internet.exchangepoint.tech