[auth48] Amelia, Ben, Nick (Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505 <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review)

[Mallory Knodel <[e-mail]>]

Dear co-authors,

Please can you review these late stage publication changes and let the RFC
Editor know whether you are fine with them?

Many thanks,
-Mallory

On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 01:17, Alice Russo <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Joseph,
>
> From this side, no open questions. The Doc Shepherd approval is considered
> complete on the Section 5.1.1 question because the sentence was updated as
> Shivan suggested ('Iran' was removed).
>
> The files are here:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.txt
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.pdf
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505.xml
>
> This diff shows only the most recent changes:
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-lastdiff.html
>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-lastrfcdiff.html (side by
> side)
>
> This diff shows all changes from the Internet-Draft:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-diff.html
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9505-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>
> We await any further changes -- and approvals -- from each author before
> continuing the publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of
> your document:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9505
>
> Thank you.
> RFC Editor/ar
>
> > On Nov 1, 2023, at 3:00 PM, Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > That appears to be the same, good find!
> >
> > All, I'm going on vacation starting tomorrow until the following Tuesday
> and I'll find some time on the planes involved to resolve as many of these
> that are outstanding. I'm hoping we can then quickly get all author
> sign-offs.
> >
> > --
> > JLH, Internet Society, [e-mail] ( https://josephhall.org/ )
> > From: Mallory Knodel <[e-mail]>
> > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2023 18:34
> > To: Alice Russo <[e-mail]>
> > Cc: [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]
> <[e-mail]>; Dr. Joseph Lorenzo Hall <[e-mail]>;
> [e-mail] <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]<
> [e-mail]>; [e-mail] <
> [e-mail]>; [e-mail]<
> [e-mail]>
> > Subject: Re: [Doc Shepherd] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9505
> <draft-irtf-pearg-censorship-10> for your review
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the top post. I was browsing this Sandvine research doc that
> is not the 2014 citation (this is from 2015) but presumably it contains
> what was originally cited?
> >
> >
> https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Nirmala-Svsg/post/Anybody-working-on-Internet-traffic-classification/attachment/59d63a5779197b807799782d/AS%3A405810988503040%401473764287142/download/traffic-classification-identifying-and-measuring-internet-traffic.pdf
> >
> > Joe I think it was from and early version of the draft so you could tell
> us if this document could replace the original.
> >
> > -M
>