Re: [auth48] [IAB] Paper references to GitHub? [was: Re: [IAB Chair] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9490 <draft-iab-m-ten-workshop-02> for your review]

[Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>]

Mirja,

On 12/5/23 2:03 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
> Hi Jean, hi Cindy,
>
> I did comment on this one separately. We did not submit the PDF. We 
> submitted a link to the blog post. Please use that link instead:
>
> https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2022/6/relays-and-online-user-privacy
>
>
> Generally, Cindy, we can’t republish these kind of contributions as we 
> don’t have the copy right. This is also true for papers that are 
> already publish somewhere else. Please also check if there are other 
> papers. Instead we should just link to the original paper on our webpage.

[JM] We found the following URL for [GRUBBS]: 
<https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/grubbs>. 
The updated reference would be:

    [GRUBBS] Grubbs, P., Arun, A., Zhang, Y., Bonneau, J., and M.
    Walfish, "Zero-Knowledge Middleboxes", 31st USENIX Security
    Symposium (USENIX Security 22), August 2022,
    <https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity22/presentation/grubbs>.



The rest of the papers in the IAB-uploads directory appear to have been 
submitted directly to the M-TEN workshop.

We will update both the [KUEHLEWIND] and [GRUBBS] references.

Best regards,
RFC Editor/jm

>
> In future is there an option to add an external link to the 
> datatracker? If not we a) need to confirm with the author if we can 
> republish (and keep that written confirmation) or b) ask them if we 
> can just publish their contribution email with the link to the paper 
> or give them an option to create some kind of extended abstract with a 
> link to the paper.
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 4. Dec 2023, at 23:39, Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>> Cindy,
>>
>> Thank you for the links. We have updated the document and have 
>> verified that the links work:
>>
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9490-lastrfcdiff.html
>>
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9490.txt
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9490.pdf
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9490.html
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9490.xml
>>
>> However, we note a discrepancy with the [KUEHLEWIND] paper. The PDF 
>> in the GitHub repo has an abstract and lists multiple authors, but 
>> the PDF in the IAB-uploads directory does not have an abstract and 
>> only has only a single author listed. The content of both PDFs 
>> appears to be the same.
>>
>> Should the PDF from the GitHub repo be placed in the IAB-uploads 
>> directory to match what was originally referenced?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> RFC Editor/jm
>>
>> On 12/4/23 3:04 PM, Cindy Morgan wrote:
>>> Hi Jean,
>>>
>>> Here are the updated paper references:
>>>
>>> OLD [BARNES]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/m-ten-workshop/blob/main/papers/Barnes-Whats-In-It-For-Me-Revisiting-the-reasons-people-collaborate.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [BARNES]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Barnes-Whats-In-It-For-Me-Revisiting-the-reasons-people-collaborate.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [CASAS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Casas-AI-driven-real-time-QoE-monitoring-encrypted-traffic.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [CASAS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Casas-AI-driven-real-time-QoE-monitoring-encrypted-traffic.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [COLLINS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Collins-Improving-Network-Monitoring-Through-Contracts.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [COLLINS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Collins-Improving-Network-Monitoring-Through-Contracts.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [DERI]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Deri-nDPI-Research-Proposal.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [DERI]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Deri-nDPI-Research-Proposal.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [ELKINS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Elkins-Performance-Monitoring-in-Encrypted-Networks-PDMv2.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [ELKINS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Elkins-Performance-Monitoring-in-Encrypted-Networks-PDMv2.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [GRUBBS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Grubbs-Zero-Knowledge%20Middleboxes.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [GRUBBS]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Grubbs-Zero-Knowledge-Middleboxes.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [HARDAKER]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Hardaker-Encrypted-Traffic-Estimation.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [HARDAKER]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Hardaker-Encrypted-Traffic-Estimation.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [JIANG]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Jiang-Towards-Designing-Robust-and-Efficient-Classifiers-for-Encrypted-Traffic-in-the-Modern-Internet.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [JIANG]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Jiang-Towards-Designing-Robust-and-Efficient-Classifiers-for-Encrypted-Traffic-in-the-Modern-Internet.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [KNODEL]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Knodel-Guidelines-for-Performing-Safe-Measurement-on-the-Internet.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [KNODEL]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Knodel-Guidelines-for-Performing-Safe-Measurement-on-the-Internet.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [KUEHLEWIND]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Kuehlewind-Relying-on-Relays.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [KUEHLEWIND]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Kuehlewind-Are-relay-services-the-key-to-online-privacy.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [LEI]:
>>>
>>> <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Lei-Encrypted-Traffic-Classification-Through-Deep-Learning.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [LEI]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Lei-Encrypted-Traffic-Classification-Through-Deep-Learning.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [PAULY]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Pauly-Red-Rover-A-collaborative-approach-to-content-filtering.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [PAULY]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Pauly-Red-Rover-A-collaborative-approach-to-content-filtering.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [WELZL]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Welzl-The-Sidecar-Opting-in-to-PEP-Functions.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [WELZL]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Welzl-The-Sidecar-Opting-in-to-PEP-Functions.pdf>
>>>
>>> OLD [WU]:
>>>
>>>   <https://github.com/intarchboard/workshop-m-ten/blob/main/papers/Wu-mten-taxonomy.pdf>
>>>
>>> NEW [WU]:
>>>
>>>   <https://www.iab.org/wp-content/IAB-uploads/2023/11/Wu-mten-taxonomy.pdf>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cindy
>>>
>>>> On Nov 30, 2023, at 1:09 PM, Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mirja,
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for the update. I've noted your approval on the AUTH48 
>>>> status page:
>>>>
>>>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9490
>>>>
>>>> Although all approvals are in, we'll keep the document in AUTH48 
>>>> pending the updates to the reference URLs.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> RFC Editor/jm
>>>>
>>>> On 11/30/23 2:33 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:
>>>>> As an update: it’s making (slow) progress. The papers are uploaded 
>>>>> in the datatracker but there was some technical issue with 
>>>>> uploading on the IAB webpage. Also there is a merged datatracker 
>>>>> change to reorg IAB workshops, however, I believe that is not 
>>>>> deployed yet. As soon as that is deployed we can probably go ahead 
>>>>> and reference the papers in the datatracker.
>>>>>
>>>>> Mirja
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 29. Nov 2023, at 23:17, Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wes,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for the update.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Jean
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/29/23 3:54 PM, Wes Hardaker wrote:
>>>>>>> Thanks Jean,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We're aware of it but AMS has a number of changes to 
>>>>>>> websites/etc to get pushed through and it's taking longer than 
>>>>>>> ideal to get this done so we can have stable archives to 
>>>>>>> reference.  It is on our plate though and sorry for the delay.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Wes
>>
>>
>