Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review
Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Sat, 13 August 2022 14:08 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F44C138FA0; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 07:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.429
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.429 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bDys6EE4Piyl; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 07:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2997DC159484; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 07:08:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [75.98.19.151]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 956351F45A; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:08:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 0DB3C1A0529; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 09:52:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
cc: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, cbor-ads@ietf.org, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3FUTF-8=3FQ=3FChristian =5FAms=3DC3=3DBCss=3F=3D?= <christian@amsuess.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
In-reply-to: <385EE1AC-8E6A-4ACF-BD78-0163B93D7AFD@tzi.org>
References: <27848.1660330319@localhost> <385EE1AC-8E6A-4ACF-BD78-0163B93D7AFD@tzi.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> message dated "Sat, 13 Aug 2022 10:48:58 +0200."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 26.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 09:52:37 -0400
Message-ID: <151573.1660398757@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/3pZEZNaV1NnaiTKbqIzSPtesyX8>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 14:08:29 -0000
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote: >> It means _Android Package Kit_ > The file extension may have originated from that, but I’m not sure that > is what it means now. Agreed. >> I'd have thought that a page like: >> https://developer.android.com/guide/components/fundamentals >> >> might expand APK before using it... > That it doesn’t may be another symptom for APK no longer actually being > an initialism. I agree, but I think we should just expand it once as Android Package Kit.
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-c… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-c… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-c… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-c… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-c… Michael Richardson
- [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Michael Richardson
- [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-… Sandy Ginoza
- [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <dr… Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-i… Sandy Ginoza
- [auth48] [IANA #1237702] Re: [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-… Amanda Baber via RT
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277… Sandy Ginoza
- [auth48] Final question - AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 … Sandy Ginoza
- Re: [auth48] Final question - AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] Final question - AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9… Michael Richardson
- Re: [auth48] Final question - AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9… John R. Levine
- Re: [auth48] Final question - AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9… Sandy Ginoza