IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Fri, 12 August 2022 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A24FC14792A; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:52:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oBADNh62ekB9; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1742C14CF18; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 11:52:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F72C1801A; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:11:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UHUXSrQwX2vk; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:11:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA9218017; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 15:11:18 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1660331478; bh=f04jcGE1duqGL16wfwOAxIK0YNcqthsnn+tbPPUXQRg=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=kE9mvxQLvAdJwuuhhnzhhYdUio2D6fDJJ0TT8dzfGTyJ4iuGpy3jfOqKH53dPKigR WSGqmYgfVvqrZxGWkPqtSRTADtMnXjB8nR8q/dn0TjYpy9Q7fp9XKinAfsvk7lAPKu XiJ51f0nmD+pGiCNxIOFAV3L4sEPG/E5pqiUAGxUDYHBoIakXkkM4n1UkZkQdhd9gC RZRpF8mzazKT0YyLLnY+AyNia9ah2tvQQfgXu1xkim5BuaVOlkV4T1U6exECYPAxH9 hr5sKhqkp+wLZYnAySH1tf0OQqTbLV16f0mElLWFXKkDwoM9lfXKMImbVow547yZnC WHelQIGx3cnSg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5425189; Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:51:59 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
cc: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, cbor-ads@ietf.org, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, =?UTF-8?Q?Christian_Ams=C3=BCss?= <christian@amsuess.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwY8KbLGGasiJWHwrJ6z7XfVhK_1-OXVJixjQS4dTV55Bg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20220803210827.2D4B455D45@rfcpa.amsl.com> <A72D6D20-35C9-4D83-95BF-B1FA5DC92821@tzi.org> <15BA74A8-D16D-456E-9C7C-DB00D4786605@amsl.com> <0E8FF20C-97E8-42ED-B13A-4072646BC927@amsl.com> <CAL0qLwY8KbLGGasiJWHwrJ6z7XfVhK_1-OXVJixjQS4dTV55Bg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:51:59 -0400
Message-ID: <27848.1660330319@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/RVs9ludyDS1cIVb8dLS3wLlbkR8>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 18:52:09 -0000

Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
    > In paragraph 7, can we expand "APK"?  It's not in the RFC Editor's
    > abbreviation list, it's not defined above, and I don't know what it is.
    > Apart from that, this is approved.

It means _Android Package Kit_

(Although Android Application PacKage is another expansion the Internet seems
to also have)

I don't have a problem with making that expansion.

I'd have thought that a page like:
https://developer.android.com/guide/components/fundamentals

might expand APK before using it...


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email