IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Tue, 30 August 2022 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31BE2C14E514; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:54:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdIRfL002-Ol; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:54:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA94BC15A729; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 07:54:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5089abf5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.137.171.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MH9Lz6m2vzDCfM; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:54:35 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <77BB1EF9-D4D1-4286-BCB1-3CE8CD0D16E6@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 16:54:35 +0200
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>, cbor-ads@ietf.org, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 683564075.4149899-2e853c282b6c724b7c8559d687d5dd03
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <974C602B-ADA2-4351-A96B-466E46CB20C3@tzi.org>
References: <27848.1660330319@localhost> <385EE1AC-8E6A-4ACF-BD78-0163B93D7AFD@tzi.org> <151573.1660398757@dooku> <CAL0qLwa5V_2KLJPMfiwJsutFJJvbOyUm4CW4Lj_ymTBaEm1H8w@mail.gmail.com> <77BB1EF9-D4D1-4286-BCB1-3CE8CD0D16E6@tzi.org>
To: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/tJ3t-MhtdFMvNwijPi-TakWD5mk>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:54:43 -0000

On 2022-08-19, at 22:22, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> OLD:
>   encoded.  For instance, an Android APK (as used to transfer and store
>   an application) may be identified as a ZIP file.  Additionally, both
> NEW:
>   encoded.  For instance, an Android Package Kit APK (as used to transfer and store
>   an application) may be identified as a ZIP file.  Additionally, both

Is this something the RFC editor wants to pick up?
It seems to me we are done here after this change.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email