IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review

Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com> Tue, 30 August 2022 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sginoza@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29778C14F737; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fYQJb5bt73VA; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE053C14F727; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3914243E49; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Itabe09teMAJ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (2603-8000-9603-b513-4028-094d-c592-b8df.res6.spectrum.com [IPv6:2603:8000:9603:b513:4028:94d:c592:b8df]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 583764243EFA; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
From: Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <974C602B-ADA2-4351-A96B-466E46CB20C3@tzi.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 15:40:00 -0700
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, cbor-ads@ietf.org, CBOR Working Group <cbor-chairs@ietf.org>, Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <835A0D17-6801-43E4-B0DB-97F1FBE98EA2@amsl.com>
References: <27848.1660330319@localhost> <385EE1AC-8E6A-4ACF-BD78-0163B93D7AFD@tzi.org> <151573.1660398757@dooku> <CAL0qLwa5V_2KLJPMfiwJsutFJJvbOyUm4CW4Lj_ymTBaEm1H8w@mail.gmail.com> <77BB1EF9-D4D1-4286-BCB1-3CE8CD0D16E6@tzi.org> <974C602B-ADA2-4351-A96B-466E46CB20C3@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/xZ39C2kuzFG0Fi-VbFP23q1aptw>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD - Murray] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9277 <draft-ietf-cbor-file-magic-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 22:40:24 -0000

Hi Carsten,

Thanks for the nudge — the document has been updated and is now ready for publication.  Apologies for the delay!

RFC Editor/sg

> On Aug 30, 2022, at 7:54 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2022-08-19, at 22:22, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> OLD:
>>  encoded.  For instance, an Android APK (as used to transfer and store
>>  an application) may be identified as a ZIP file.  Additionally, both
>> NEW:
>>  encoded.  For instance, an Android Package Kit APK (as used to transfer and store
>>  an application) may be identified as a ZIP file.  Additionally, both
> 
> Is this something the RFC editor wants to pick up?
> It seems to me we are done here after this change.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email