Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review

[Russ Housley <[e-mail]>]

> On Apr 21, 2023, at 3:48 PM, Alanna Paloma <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Russ, Stefan, Carsten, and Roman*,
> 
> *Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the updates in Section 4.1 and in Appendices A.2, B.3, and B.4, as well as the removal of RFC 6838 as a normative reference in the diff file below.
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-auth48diff.html
> 
> All - We do not believe that our query regarding ABNF in Section 4.3 has been addressed (see below). Please review and let us know how to proceed with this.
> 
>> Russ - We have an additional question. You indicated that the sourcecode in Section 4.3 is ABNF:
>> 
>>> Section 4.1: the type is ASN.1
>>> Section 4.3: the type is ABNF
>>> Section 4.4: the type is ASN.1
>>> Section:4.4.2: the type is ASN.1
>>> Section 4.4.3: the type is ASN.1
>> 
>> We see that this sourcecode is copied directly from RFC 2397 (which does not mention ABNF) and has a verified erratum report against it (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2045). In addition, when we tried to parse it using the tool at https://author-tools.ietf.org/abnf, we got a number of errors. Should we remove type=“abnf” and take any further actions per the erratum? Please let us know how to proceed. 
> 
> We have updated the files per mail from Russ. Please review the updates carefully and let us know if any further updates are needed. 
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.xml 
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.pdf
> 
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-lastdiff.html (last version to this one)
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9399
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
>> On Apr 20, 2023, at 7:19 AM, Carsten Bormann <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2023-04-20, at 16:03, Russ Housley <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Let's stop going in circles.
>> 
>> OK, thank you for your repeated explanations.
>> I’ll shut up until I see what you are actually proposing.
>> 
>> Grüße, Carsten
>> 
>