Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review
Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 20 April 2023 13:03 UTC
Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82371C151B06; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:03:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GZsqrIXuQsPz; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D33C15153E; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 06:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc9a4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.201.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Q2Hsh15t2zDCd7; Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:03:52 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <D16DC362-9EBB-43CA-935E-A12FEF84F64C@vigilsec.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 15:03:51 +0200
Cc: Stefan Santesson <sts@aaa-sec.com>, Trevor Freeman <frtrevor@amazon.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, lamps-ads@ietf.org, LAMPS Chairs <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 703688628.3784879-534c8e508343d157663ed71be41ad4cb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <16BA8E25-8ACF-4DF5-8D24-773E2796D989@tzi.org>
References: <20230407181524.E739B7FDC0@rfcpa.amsl.com> <F90558EB-F03B-4461-9EE5-1C220530D488@tzi.org> <dee8a7d7-c023-f07a-4776-ac3c395ee553@aaa-sec.com> <3F480C86-C862-4A47-8CE6-C3A6A069B574@tzi.org> <9CFDA284-E444-492A-8D21-8406B12DA6F3@vigilsec.com> <9ABA86A8-7F07-42F8-BF84-A0BF0124B1A0@tzi.org> <D087B817-E5E5-4D4D-814E-6096526523E2@vigilsec.com> <ACE9B926-FB1B-4ED2-973F-13B61E25AC59@tzi.org> <4C588A9B-A63E-447E-BA32-4FBED6B00A52@vigilsec.com> <EEF19E07-F362-412D-A9BC-BA7B94411B30@tzi.org> <D16DC362-9EBB-43CA-935E-A12FEF84F64C@vigilsec.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/kTn4OajxKouYESbLFtk0bdbTXtc>
Subject: Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2023 13:03:58 -0000
On 2023-04-20, at 14:59, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote: > > We were given advice in the media-type mail list. We are following that advice. The MEDIAMAN WG needs to finish their work for a media type with more than one plus sign to get registered. So, we are moving forward based on that advice. This is great. So this sounds like you should fix Table 1 and Appendix C to no longer use such a media type name (search for +xml+). Grüße, Carsten
- [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… rfc-editor
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Carsten Bormann
- [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Carsten Bormann
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Russ Housley
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Leonard Rosenthol
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Stefan Santesson
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Alanna Paloma
- Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-i… Roman Danyliw
- Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-l… Alanna Paloma