IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review

Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com> Mon, 24 April 2023 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554C7C14CE42 for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 02:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pox3QFEt-NFP for <auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 02:31:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.outgoing.loopia.se (smtp.outgoing.loopia.se [93.188.3.37]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE73C151B1B for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 02:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s807.loopia.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A6F2F81B5C for <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from s981.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s807.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF72E27DA4; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from s472.loopia.se (unknown [172.22.191.6]) by s981.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F6F22B1750; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amavis.loopia.se
Received: from s899.loopia.se ([172.22.191.6]) by s472.loopia.se (s472.loopia.se [172.22.190.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with UTF8LMTP id FTBeikqCJM6c; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:05 +0200 (CEST)
X-Loopia-Auth: user
X-Loopia-User: mailstore2@aaa-sec.com
X-Loopia-Originating-IP: 85.235.7.89
Received: from [192.168.2.68] (gw.aaa-sec.ideon.se [85.235.7.89]) (Authenticated sender: mailstore2@aaa-sec.com) by s899.loopia.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72BDA2C8BABE; Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:05 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <f1610dca-9ba3-bb64-4a55-77d97afbae8c@aaa-sec.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 11:31:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
Cc: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>, Stefan Santesson <sts@aaa-sec.com>, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, Trevor Freeman <frtrevor@amazon.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, lamps-ads@ietf.org, LAMPS Chairs <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
References: <20230407181524.E739B7FDC0@rfcpa.amsl.com> <3F480C86-C862-4A47-8CE6-C3A6A069B574@tzi.org> <9CFDA284-E444-492A-8D21-8406B12DA6F3@vigilsec.com> <9ABA86A8-7F07-42F8-BF84-A0BF0124B1A0@tzi.org> <D087B817-E5E5-4D4D-814E-6096526523E2@vigilsec.com> <ACE9B926-FB1B-4ED2-973F-13B61E25AC59@tzi.org> <4C588A9B-A63E-447E-BA32-4FBED6B00A52@vigilsec.com> <EEF19E07-F362-412D-A9BC-BA7B94411B30@tzi.org> <D16DC362-9EBB-43CA-935E-A12FEF84F64C@vigilsec.com> <16BA8E25-8ACF-4DF5-8D24-773E2796D989@tzi.org> <0A24F906-7F87-43A9-8B5C-4049839FD969@vigilsec.com> <B624C581-49CB-473B-9133-89109C82741D@tzi.org> <D772A5DF-3C30-4596-A748-53CF04702BCE@vigilsec.com> <D21F6756-C2AD-4BD3-A483-A9E9A10E6158@tzi.org> <B866202C-3073-41AE-BD03-57AD0323503A@amsl.com> <0FD1353E-9DFE-434C-A975-C0509DB9777D@tzi.org> <B73DE7BE-4596-4AF7-812A-A4132CF52156@vigilsec.com> <386B68B0-2CC7-401C-8CB4-619C65CECBB1@tzi.org> <3624a642-f2e9-9e63-620d-c47df1d287bc@aaa-sec.com> <52AB1503-0ED7-4D62-953A-EDFBADD67724@tzi.org>
Content-Language: sv-SE, en-GB
From: Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com>
Autocrypt: addr=stefan@aaa-sec.com; keydata= xsDNBGB0SQwBDADRZIRQH2PciJEmsZ7noEFV8jdtUoB/3AiNPg5CYWJz3YlB1ZyqizIYRXlY EzhIcHRCdn+NrJvReq3Xi3kvycqvhUrrxMIxMYY7YZEripjrbyleFbbZjX4oCu+CTRj8y1Wo V6h9fLlpdqEriXwQ1brs1F/4KmHXTli4FIAmRTzdGBDWgD9sg2UmuloC4+A3d2Zoo6D6Tbjv Piyy3hwqdxjOF0tXSrtH9OXkyoIlmOdaHKLT3hB7nRlurq7dWZYGsnWIIg6YIMwA/eo6OHry nq9OpQ2Zktz40r6WaOARM4RTJgBI45BgR0IVXGJG3ie05lrORYxfLKJ9//JR+4VqY/6RC85C L5Ch6KH7smzraNZXZWPlDjrs25O0X2PwEwv676vJ9tDY7oLN0RHpVMYFx2GOKAYtH0K1BAwY yFlSNRmLbSjNPnGN4yk6ad5J6HB/Z9A0On/Ud2R8eXR5ZJVBNDdcCjM2L2WleRoTbh52DmhX yisi1loEROOZjaqfBf03jlsAEQEAAc0lU3RlZmFuIFNhbnRlc3NvbiA8c3RlZmFuQGFhYS1z ZWMuY29tPsLBDwQTAQgAORYhBKkgqX8QoC/CtVBH1S8bGjmXZjPRBQJgdEkMBQkFo5qAAhsD BQsJCAcCBhUICQoLAgUWAgMBAAAKCRAvGxo5l2Yz0S+7C/94cy3pZYEK9E1PCSwtSYcVrpuJ FwEioeoswoCVU5JzCdiyv4kSP3+lY35Z71Dw1pzoBrSsLb7xbRLrEdoM05AQqRK3eaioI/8R nbPg5M+H86m7Y7bxYzBpcJ+ipNCvA2BbE+2YLSmHEEA0nTWbXtamqib+5jWRd0i/DTtTCzaP /IVSxy7PVcyB8KEF09Go5LFeZOJquIyfHU1KVjG+8UxKSjcyO3Rku5Rdt1D4tX7M6G5d1PMj BqLZPFYUvi5hB2sftMcmZzy9QLkP+2oLlo0R+vc50JO5jpUC1czAXRdp6Rr2r0mFbz1mV6Je AvN4PcFoepTwq97c0lg+zZL5swfcNSAEFKXWZgKJxo6b2iby2wDqaWORjQSNlqKETFOUeQDH dcqLPioQbW95MPa8DtfHGYbdKjk5esyY/PFQw0xR4XvrZx7CeIb6gwGgQByZqTP/lbzWnPHE zpL0DslrtBdfF+i90xGlz0FB4GVQVmygfB4g/l0bajzCb06cyjMiqTrOwM0EYHRJDAEMALsD BRBzhRH3qTcPvO3sFG3VvWlNlKiAKW5XlVp3yw/mBdaVhg0BMb0LlmEamz4HHMoL5hmfUDLS 4TJfJhZMY3ZufvGwVYsiZpl5YtebkH3M8ik5dfUz15xg0ievm3foJLjOwAutS1BKRJSrEnMt YjPqS8APSYs3pd1s1zPfvwaTYy5MrNE6mS2LDqbKA4nJVdq3LpEaBmSW+njfQAIZTRKmgxsb 6kxn4JWVseVRKKDMbqSHZpm8a4RO194FOqdXEz9fTVz2Zn8nJ1zJZTNWzcsHq3gBtM84kwUo NghYDqExuIHahojUHXHntfjZ5ZDW4/ZbOcCrVRDNWWoIoxBvxz10+TPgM+/ytA8VFr4Sglnj 1pnnRFs7aUXa5zIoFUC7NKWCR158ujnYD6S6Ap4nkDhdovL54azvt+/ChWiuQqoQSPE2ihLo vkM8cR9UNPjBVAuLA+pr6RPeg8LrjMRD86lBCfc5KkiP22oTOVzZal+jGgdgiYvD13KM2jUd VB8H9QARAQABwsD8BBgBCAAmFiEEqSCpfxCgL8K1UEfVLxsaOZdmM9EFAmB0SQ0FCQWjmoAC GwwACgkQLxsaOZdmM9Gc3wv/Wyquulv2Y7kUPXITDs/oLugd2Lx6KhFfPOhaoe2amQqhWk8H Hhauqb2Qx8rMFeDmaqzfxLsRpM0FMjtovH3XswPuZoZ3mLw0XuHGgU5QVS/zL6NrNVdwq8dv OV5m6QCm0RomI1cPRAB8P6/bbJy+FUBWvqqCUbQo5T5KXYgNwA/m1Y/S5cej/Wz3V7/Ixwkl 2t63TTrhnXBBGkAz5ApBT/YJ7L89eHLZJUMJJXaNewfhb3dIcZgza705BU5jHchpmJtTzgnS PaYqhKciMQUxd8/8jJ/XqlNVw7XxY77mNK+9BDf7y2EG6bRrzQExhS08vtuPexOE66IXdRId kENY+UQeopSb6EXU6eRD7BsXHLRfxzvs0+wMU7lRUigiONMUv54p6PqBa8PMFV4Jv8NcB9Qu Phy/7YtaBjmJn0FDTKpbDYILwh0WNoxjFqWI3jMo2ZTVjKY0aJMndJ0MxB3eAHjhQLkeKtIL 4831tbIM6eKC9gY3xUsE4vSV/CPdPKjV
Organization: 3xA Security AB
In-Reply-To: <52AB1503-0ED7-4D62-953A-EDFBADD67724@tzi.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/d_vkPfe8KHY8_DKSUPbzWABrB6U>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 09:31:25 -0000

Oh, I see.

Sorry for being confused and thanks for clearing this up.

With regard to 4.3. If it doesn't conform with ABNF, can't we just mark 
it as text? It's just a quote. Even removing it from this spec would 
work for me if that would be simpler. The format is well known and 
understood anyway.

/Stefan


On 2023-04-24 11:11, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2023-04-24, at 09:34, Stefan Santesson <stefan@aaa-sec.com> wrote:
>> stuck in this discussion in AUTH48
> (I don’t think you are — the RFC editor essentially asked whether the sourcecode snippet can be marked type=“abnf”, and the answer is “almost”.  From here, this is essentially a question about the degree of lenience associated with type=“abnf”, which is certainly not for this RFC to decide.  BTW, the snippet validates in bap after sed s/:=/=/ but is missing additional rules.  I don’t think it is useful by itself because of this, i.e.:
>
> ; type UNDEFINED
> ; subtype UNDEFINED
> ; urlchar UNDEFINED
> ; attribute UNDEFINED
> ; value UNDEFINED
>
> and the errata resolution needs to be applied, replacing urlchar.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email