IETF Logo Mail Archive

[auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Fri, 21 April 2023 19:48 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11089C151B0E; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.198
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.198 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4of_WQjuJxRd; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D382DC151711; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B250D424FFE1; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9ZclnBU64m2; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:cd6a:1aeb:f6b6:90cc]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 482A7424FFE0; Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <D21F6756-C2AD-4BD3-A483-A9E9A10E6158@tzi.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 12:48:18 -0700
Cc: Trevor Freeman <frtrevor@amazon.com>, Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, lamps-ads@ietf.org, LAMPS Chairs <lamps-chairs@ietf.org>, Tim Hollebeek <tim.hollebeek@digicert.com>, auth48archive@rfc-editor.org, RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B866202C-3073-41AE-BD03-57AD0323503A@amsl.com>
References: <20230407181524.E739B7FDC0@rfcpa.amsl.com> <F90558EB-F03B-4461-9EE5-1C220530D488@tzi.org> <dee8a7d7-c023-f07a-4776-ac3c395ee553@aaa-sec.com> <3F480C86-C862-4A47-8CE6-C3A6A069B574@tzi.org> <9CFDA284-E444-492A-8D21-8406B12DA6F3@vigilsec.com> <9ABA86A8-7F07-42F8-BF84-A0BF0124B1A0@tzi.org> <D087B817-E5E5-4D4D-814E-6096526523E2@vigilsec.com> <ACE9B926-FB1B-4ED2-973F-13B61E25AC59@tzi.org> <4C588A9B-A63E-447E-BA32-4FBED6B00A52@vigilsec.com> <EEF19E07-F362-412D-A9BC-BA7B94411B30@tzi.org> <D16DC362-9EBB-43CA-935E-A12FEF84F64C@vigilsec.com> <16BA8E25-8ACF-4DF5-8D24-773E2796D989@tzi.org> <0A24F906-7F87-43A9-8B5C-4049839FD969@vigilsec.com> <B624C581-49CB-473B-9133-89109C82741D@tzi.org> <D772A5DF-3C30-4596-A748-53CF04702BCE@vigilsec.com> <D21F6756-C2AD-4BD3-A483-A9E9A10E6158@tzi.org>
To: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Stefan Santesson <sts@aaa-sec.com>, "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/m-YRr1ssoLTsGxS0aFLopi8qqSY>
Subject: [auth48] [AD] Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9399 <draft-ietf-lamps-rfc3709bis-10> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 19:48:25 -0000

Hi Russ, Stefan, Carsten, and Roman*,

*Roman - As the AD, please review and approve of the updates in Section 4.1 and in Appendices A.2, B.3, and B.4, as well as the removal of RFC 6838 as a normative reference in the diff file below.
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-auth48diff.html

All - We do not believe that our query regarding ABNF in Section 4.3 has been addressed (see below). Please review and let us know how to proceed with this.

> Russ - We have an additional question. You indicated that the sourcecode in Section 4.3 is ABNF:
> 
>> Section 4.1: the type is ASN.1
>> Section 4.3: the type is ABNF
>> Section 4.4: the type is ASN.1
>> Section:4.4.2: the type is ASN.1
>> Section 4.4.3: the type is ASN.1
> 
> We see that this sourcecode is copied directly from RFC 2397 (which does not mention ABNF) and has a verified erratum report against it (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2045). In addition, when we tried to parse it using the tool at https://author-tools.ietf.org/abnf, we got a number of errors. Should we remove type=“abnf” and take any further actions per the erratum? Please let us know how to proceed. 

We have updated the files per mail from Russ. Please review the updates carefully and let us know if any further updates are needed. 

The files have been posted here (please refresh):
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.xml 
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.txt
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.html
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399.pdf

The relevant diff files have been posted here:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9399-lastdiff.html (last version to this one)

For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
 https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9399

Thank you,
RFC Editor/ap

> On Apr 20, 2023, at 7:19 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:
> 
> On 2023-04-20, at 16:03, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Let's stop going in circles.
> 
> OK, thank you for your repeated explanations.
> I’ll shut up until I see what you are actually proposing.
> 
> Grüße, Carsten
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email