IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents

John Border <John.Border@hughes.com> Mon, 14 February 2011 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <John.Border@hughes.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBD23A6DAF for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id unpgySY35ofC for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hnse2.hns.com (hnse2.hns.com [208.236.67.201]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91D83A6D55 for <behave@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:35:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hughes.com (expexchub.hughes.com [139.85.54.34]) by hnse2.hns.com (Switch-3.3.4/Switch-3.3.4) with ESMTP id p1EJZtaJ000769 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for <behave@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:35:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from EXPEXCVS1.hughes.com ([139.85.54.30]) by expexchub1.hughes.com ([10.33.14.13]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:35:55 -0500
From: John Border <John.Border@hughes.com>
To: "'behave' (behave@ietf.org)" <behave@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 14:35:53 -0500
Thread-Topic: Call for WG adoption of several documents
Thread-Index: AcvMeOBolr6cyFteQDK8V1YifKfcvQABWA4Q
Message-ID: <982B8F9A4E5BDC4B89FF7586464DD2190198A7E27DFD@EXPEXCVS1.hughes.com>
References: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653AF59C76@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653AF59C76@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_982B8F9A4E5BDC4B89FF7586464DD2190198A7E27DFDEXPEXCVS1hu_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:35:37 -0000

    Would the first two be combined into a single document or will they remain separate?  Just curious...

    Either way, I am in favor of adopting all of them...


John



From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 2:15 PM
To: 'behave' (behave@ietf.org)
Subject: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents

On our charter we have the following milestones for which there is no current WG document:
Apr 2011

Submit to IESG: avoiding NAT64 with dual-stack host for local networks (std)

Apr 2011

Submit to IESG: NAT64 load balancing (std/info)


For the first milestone, the chairs believe there are two complementary drafts that together may meet the milestone.  These are:
draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-01<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-01>
(-00 was presented last IETF, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/behave.txt)


http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-behave-dns64-config-02
(this was presented at IETF 77, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/77/minutes/behave.txt)

For the second milestone, there is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-behave-nat64-load-balancing-01
(-00 was presented last IETF, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/behave.txt)

This email is to solicit WG feedback on whether to adopt each of the above documents as WG documents.
As a reminder, adoption as a WG document means there is consensus that the document is a good starting point
(but may still need work of course).

Please respond saying whether or not you support WG adoption at this time of each document under consideration above.

Thanks,
-Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email