IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents

Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com> Mon, 14 February 2011 19:45 UTC

Return-Path: <dthaler@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: behave@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC90C3A6A04 for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:45:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.323
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.323 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.275, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QSpytJ8PTK8v for <behave@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2573A6D9B for <behave@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:46:04 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.39) by TK5EX14MLTC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.79.174) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.2; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:46:04 -0800
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.4.97]) by TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.39]) with mapi; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:46:03 -0800
From: Dave Thaler <dthaler@microsoft.com>
To: John Border <John.Border@hughes.com>
Thread-Topic: Call for WG adoption of several documents
Thread-Index: AcvMeOBolr6cyFteQDK8V1YifKfcvQABWA4QAABYRpA=
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:46:02 +0000
Message-ID: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653AF59E1F@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653AF59C76@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <982B8F9A4E5BDC4B89FF7586464DD2190198A7E27DFD@EXPEXCVS1.hughes.com>
In-Reply-To: <982B8F9A4E5BDC4B89FF7586464DD2190198A7E27DFD@EXPEXCVS1.hughes.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653AF59E1FTK5EX14MBXW604w_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "'behave' (behave@ietf.org)" <behave@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents
X-BeenThere: behave@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: mailing list of BEHAVE IETF WG <behave.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/behave>
List-Post: <mailto:behave@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/behave>, <mailto:behave-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:45:45 -0000

Dan and I had assumed they would remain separate if adopted,
but WG opinion on that would be good to hear too.

From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John Border
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 11:36 AM
To: 'behave' (behave@ietf.org)
Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents


    Would the first two be combined into a single document or will they remain separate?  Just curious...

    Either way, I am in favor of adopting all of them...


John



From: behave-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:behave-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dave Thaler
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 2:15 PM
To: 'behave' (behave@ietf.org)
Subject: [BEHAVE] Call for WG adoption of several documents

On our charter we have the following milestones for which there is no current WG document:
Apr 2011

Submit to IESG: avoiding NAT64 with dual-stack host for local networks (std)

Apr 2011

Submit to IESG: NAT64 load balancing (std/info)


For the first milestone, the chairs believe there are two complementary drafts that together may meet the milestone.  These are:
draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-01<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-korhonen-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-01>
(-00 was presented last IETF, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/behave.txt)


http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-behave-dns64-config-02
(this was presented at IETF 77, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/77/minutes/behave.txt)

For the second milestone, there is:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-behave-nat64-load-balancing-01
(-00 was presented last IETF, see minutes at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/behave.txt)

This email is to solicit WG feedback on whether to adopt each of the above documents as WG documents.
As a reminder, adoption as a WG document means there is consensus that the document is a good starting point
(but may still need work of course).

Please respond saying whether or not you support WG adoption at this time of each document under consideration above.

Thanks,
-Dave

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email