Re: ISPACs
Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> Fri, 06 December 1996 07:50 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa06793; 6 Dec 96 2:50 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05092; 6 Dec 96 2:50 EST
Received: from red.jnx.com (red.jnx.com [208.197.169.254]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id RAA07361 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 17:50:46 +1100
Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.246]) by red.jnx.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA03642; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA21566; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 22:49:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 1996 22:49:56 -0800
Message-Id: <199612060649.WAA21566@chimp.jnx.com>
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: curtis@ans.net
CC: curtis@ans.net, nanog@merit.edu, cidrd@iepg.org, metro@nlanr.net
In-reply-to: <199612060538.AAA18101@brookfield.ans.net> (message from Curtis Villamizar on Fri, 06 Dec 1996 00:38:39 -0500)
Subject: Re: ISPACs
I think that putting together RFCs that propose that ISDs pursue certain legal and financial arrangements is well outside the scope of the operations area and the IETF for that matter. I don't see this as an allocation issue or a technical issue wrt policy routing. As is applies to operating a small provider and a potential means to cooperate with other small providers by forming some sort of consortium it maybe could be considered an operations area item. I think what you have here is out of scope. Curtis, I think you miss the point. The goal is to solve technical problems (aggregation, renumbering). The side effects are legal and financial and we get blasted if we _don't_ discuss them. Years of CIDR bashing has made us, uh, somewhat sensitive to this. So this time, we're trying to discuss those issues up front. Tony
- ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Stephen Stuart
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs John W. Stewart III
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Dave Siegel
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- RE: ISPACs Mathew Lodge
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN