Re: ISPACs
Stephen Stuart <stuart@pa.dec.com> Thu, 05 December 1996 08:56 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa06140; 5 Dec 96 3:56 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04619; 5 Dec 96 3:56 EST
Received: from mail2.digital.com (mail2.digital.com [204.123.2.56]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id TAA02879 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Thu, 5 Dec 1996 19:05:22 +1100
Received: from pobox1.pa.dec.com by mail2.digital.com (5.65 EXP 4/12/95 for V3.2/1.0/WV) id AA10423; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:58:55 -0800
Received: by pobox1.pa.dec.com; id AA28748; Wed, 4 Dec 96 23:57:56 -0800
Received: from localhost by nsl-too.pa.dec.com; (5.65v3.2/1.1.8.2/13Jul94-0558PM) id AA10466; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 23:57:44 -0800
Message-Id: <9612050757.AA10466@nsl-too.pa.dec.com>
To: "Justin W. Newton" <justin@erols.com>
Cc: cidrd@iepg.org, stuart@pa.dec.com
Subject: Re: ISPACs
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 04 Dec 96 21:48:14 -0500. <3.0b36.32.19961204214814.0134def8@justin.erols.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 23:57:44 -0800
From: Stephen Stuart <stuart@pa.dec.com>
X-Mts: smtp
Based on Justin's comment below: > At 05:10 PM 12/4/96 -0800, Tony Li wrote: > > > > I can't see how ISPACs are anything but a NOOP. If members of the > > ISPAC connect to different providers then aggregation can't be > > performed. > > > >? Why not? Yes, they have to provide transit to each other for the full > >ISPAC prefix.... > > [...] I am suddenly dependant on someone who > I am /not/ paying, who is likely a direct competitor of mine, and who can > likely provide me no garuntee as to the technical ability of their staff. ISPACs are, then, a form of fate-sharing? In terms of promoting inter-provider cooperation, ISPACs might be just the ticket (no pun intended), by demanding cooperation within small groups whose fates are entwined. Or would that be unworkable in the face of the lawyering required to implement it? Stephen - ----- Stephen Stuart stuart@pa.dec.com Network Systems Laboratory Digital Equipment Corporation
- ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Stephen Stuart
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs John W. Stewart III
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Dave Siegel
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- RE: ISPACs Mathew Lodge
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN