Re: ISPACs
Tony Li <tli@jnx.com> Sat, 07 December 1996 08:12 UTC
Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11283; 7 Dec 96 3:12 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03685; 7 Dec 96 3:12 EST
Received: from red.jnx.com (red.jnx.com [208.197.169.254]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id SAA05131 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Sat, 7 Dec 1996 18:05:52 +1100
Received: from chimp.jnx.com (chimp.jnx.com [208.197.169.246]) by red.jnx.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA24881; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 23:05:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from tli@localhost) by chimp.jnx.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA23657; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 23:05:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 23:05:24 -0800
Message-Id: <199612070705.XAA23657@chimp.jnx.com>
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: justin@erols.com
CC: cidrd@iepg.org
In-reply-to: <3.0b36.32.19961206152653.0090e270@justin.erols.com>
Subject: Re: ISPACs
No, you are missing my point here. The packets ned to get to the interconnect somehow. There are 2 ways that the packets acn get to the interexchange (unless I am missing something very obvious) 1) The providers who are members of the ISPAC announce the aggregate announcement and then route the specific traffic for individual ISPs to the interconnect (or over the interconnect, whatever). 2) The interconnect itself advertisies the aggregate announcement and then routes to the ISPAC members. Setup 1) leads to the problem of dependancy on your competitors to get your traffic from the Internet at large. Setup 2) basically makes the interconnect provider your upstream provider, the same as Sprint, MCI or UUNET would be. What am I missing? (Please use small words as I am obviously missing what you are trying to teach me.) I was suggesting setup 2, as that would seem to be what you'd be most comfortable with. Except that the "interconnect provider" _is_ the ISPAC administration. I'm missing why you're uncomfortable with this. Tony
- ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Stephen Stuart
- Re: ISPACs Vadim Antonov
- Re: ISPACs John W. Stewart III
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- Re: ISPACs Dave Siegel
- Re: ISPACs Justin W. Newton
- RE: ISPACs Mathew Lodge
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Curtis Villamizar
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN
- Re: ISPACs Paul Resnick
- Re: ISPACs Tony Li
- Re: ISPACs Brian Carpenter CERN-CN