IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)

Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com> Sat, 01 August 2015 11:00 UTC

Return-Path: <loganaden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D6E1B2E35 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 04:00:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cP9BklHoRiWr for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2A921B2E34 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabkd10 with SMTP id kd10so55477557pab.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4mgQ2J+Z5yliHSMoS+Geu2xZYb8D09e/8n1EPjUib7k=; b=CLlEFYvCgpWSeFNXA4LrDsKLORfMMWZ2TqUTOyQPlyu/a5uYdW0PxOPPjHAspF1Kbe WN9gwLG+hrVrpUA7NLzYCLaE7H/eMuHUVap4OTMcPOvN291zW+VVuWjwjyU7Nu5SQtYN VSMoeVYLYg7xPDC/fAmKNOLjF9U+jZYy7y9XaeqkPTFcWY7zC37rgN7m2HxT/Gbqw/Co 3SRxjFk6KcC8rDwYRMTZT3PVc8NNcALP5lNTHPYZeUDwm2tVMZNCdDmL+TeTsHe0dKHn mSmqzsaqWpmcivtapo8RgZNvfgXBgSbIhnBNLSX4EihgvMmQuNNB669aXe9CeG+lrA+f g+UQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.67.12.136 with SMTP id eq8mr16832515pad.3.1438426811477; Sat, 01 Aug 2015 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.236.134 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Aug 2015 04:00:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 11:00:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOp4FwQfzfTi9PQJvPTjH=oDvg8WoAx_g6U5wM2hrAHncrJuHw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Loganaden Velvindron <loganaden@gmail.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/kfK2JlTvlwJT5pUSRf7dZp5VIRY>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Aug 2015 11:00:13 -0000

Hi folks,

I do not agree that the document should be marked as dead.

It should continue as Standards Track.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email