IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 10 August 2015 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633671A6EE6 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.012
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QtRI5eFoh2HA for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x234.google.com (mail-yk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42A111A00CC for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykdz80 with SMTP id z80so22246019ykd.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=MOyEl6ULqiEaIWNhGCkq8Yx5wN15nEudm3OzV8HeO1Y=; b=CkLFdQUJ8iuuL9LpaLTX6qSV7Mbz0nQ4wyTXRyTHJv4iE/M9SdfWV4ZsVrtOAMvH6N /gukuiwBzKnFcjW9oUNIpM4JjL1XAILUiuhFBMz751NNgEdvVRu+9X3WCGkNcSMhAVLC iOW305KJPti8Fs7A5T/zEx+JT++fMiXa7nAK9+zEPivVYikicKMyPTNjVVZkTdlnJSsm le19o7lRq0fPOl2LoPvZ5KhRPEpBIxsHzcUgfS559WT7KDbFa1QOeYIr79xkZSUpJb2e muRgLDJ18sod2A20LQrJrGHlqAUd1D+GHn2Zq3wPF1NM4MA9eozMAAC0PQbLPFOp4kZH Q6gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=MOyEl6ULqiEaIWNhGCkq8Yx5wN15nEudm3OzV8HeO1Y=; b=BUracUvX3O3/zXYKLQAgci+fjj4DwetnIY5zlVvjlmq//gW9JYHEplvF+hwR3r90MK GfFHiyhFaDzjoAW/xf5/vIXwaweMUHiS80qBdSrEo3bVc6FOvxIQUzZ4ra7lCH5ht4+R MbPZZvmKvsLh0wlEgt3s0vPsvfX1VPJflzTWRwjvDgYmRxzRM2zkqRM1cyYNXpOJe7y6 NaQOHSXTrn4eMpCMcbFry9/zNOEXqY9uCyHLOYBIU5lhn9kRyiO37ARDwwoIpnD2r0cj uyGAJ7RVEK6gBzcHCz3yl9cZetyp5/LfBlh3CBFm0K2xhm+C1kgC8b9c2iRdH6R/NH9Q RClQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnr/pWMNYonabJCiuGUYgA9UxR5bpHsVIRneuUIrVjeqmKwYW+TW/MfRg/0i+1vJfF7JPRp
X-Received: by 10.170.153.85 with SMTP id u82mr20250027ykc.53.1439195473545; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.116.147 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 01:30:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55C36F70.9010704@si6networks.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB90384@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <55B91127.9020403@gmail.com> <55BB7978.3030805@si6networks.com> <55BFD0E9.7050605@gmail.com> <55C36F70.9010704@si6networks.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:30:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0HQ+-gxaxnFO_OeuqcHemLb4QaNR6wfXw5cbeC+AgDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b396ef6f9c3051cf0cef8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/o246JG4OGzULbMOB3Qcqc-pvHSU>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 08:31:16 -0000

On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> > Keep in mind that WG consensus is not something set in stone. People
> > change their minds over time. More analysis and better understanding of
> > a problem is available over time. New solutions are being proposed.
> > These all influence people decisions. Work that used to be appealing may
> > lose its appeal over time. Successful adoption call answers the question
> > whether a WG is willing to work on something, not a promise to publish
> > the draft no matter what. Drafts can be abandoned at any stage. It may
> > be disappointing when it happens, but it happens nevertheless.
>
> FWIW, I've love to see a "please state whether you want this I-D to be
> dropped, and state the reasons for dloing so"..
>

Those statements are already in the list archives. They are also, no doubt,
part of the reason why the chairs chose to proceed as they did, by asking
the "do you want to drop this document" question in the room, registering
strong consensus (and I agree - I was there and it seemed very strong to
me), and taking that question to the mailing list.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email