IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 05 August 2015 02:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1216F1A8927 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:58:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76jk3ZZeX_fo for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414C41A899B for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ykeo23 with SMTP id o23so24917723yke.3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KXivFpQtLYuZAXyNpXr8JdbifviegUew5I42+auo9js=; b=WLW7SrBpYFVy+LFBwcIBfl96KJtj9oZEkaj3jCQZb3Pn0432Fj4b/rB8jGsa1jkjbd EITzgoBD2oiBraU+huV46Jq1oNitoZHfXZY6vWDZACWCjMesXyz+TrefRgxVSfKrtGpk lkR76lgQUKngOJ1D1dGhJ2XhxolGgixy/kRlaROQyqzz5VSEMBer7ivAUiOxzrF7u0Nh Wdrgjg/UtmttGGA2a6gUg7L9gKe6SrpfKiIrNIUmXJicID2ul5HphyhUH5rUfUntp61C 6O3gcfVCyFYo9sJUFlJkQkXMBymnaeigBjgtod02wK2rMdxk3ObWjsBIR5Q0bi18isk9 SMew==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=KXivFpQtLYuZAXyNpXr8JdbifviegUew5I42+auo9js=; b=C2L0g0x0StkKM5c24mgCCWBWoRA73VBPJeVEDlZrDFM0+p+BL9upS8UvEmBbGUw/j+ oRMFTyPZfjjGub3dYG/GftxrRS6J2t6yCPzBMqM6eVXDDmUExfHtLEY0egzETkZ5oSmh IU2GyiimLtSqfYJdSh+r26YxNGIy9FGnjIjfJSn+i1C0zSePeIrtXBhC8GnJYS5XvXC5 /vBQ08vRipzmRXjlDN5IhyxquSzvqMjwiu9efzVRuxeNqncbLCgl2/IEucw8hZ5vPFWk +P1m1o5xxCLXmCJ8wHoVsiDmpDkZVnZ6YxKiVKI8Qe5hQHTzZ0l4Pp6bmz2KJYoH2Qb4 FR8g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkH7vwLRjIU+NQqGUOWZj/Zv13vgJySa5BWZ4rqvtatZRM9D4VdHfGGrIDQFSscaNwcqFbO
X-Received: by 10.170.119.85 with SMTP id l82mr7300807ykb.89.1438743510556; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.8.201 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:58:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB90384@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB90384@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:58:11 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2fTkNZC4gCnVs3McPLZScYbgVfTBfV02WLvvh+3zDa7A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113908ecdf14fa051c87932b"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/yIDPUgGuJ2s2PmX7zcdctEsrDEM>
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 02:58:32 -0000

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:25 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:

> Thus, if you do NOT agree with the intended action to mark the document as
> “dead”, please indicate so and specify why you feel this document is needed
> and whether to continue as Standards Track or Informational. Please respond
> on or before August 11th, 2015.
>

Bernie: to be clear, you're saying that if someone does agree with the
action taken in the WG and does not support this document, then no action
is required, right?

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status