IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 393AB3A0EFC; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFB03A0EFA; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MSN-VTx4P2w; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi1-x235.google.com (mail-oi1-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743FE3A0EEB; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi1-x235.google.com with SMTP id z22so723600oid.1; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/d/BiBLfLEwPOvF14pxlCJc6aaKCV4A3/CAkaJiFDzc=; b=qKnayONzXE1hsNe/sYiiudfDtaJBPtoiMK/Cx3/iQyvRRydDFwLQIZG5iMtjfui9IA M4LO+zEX9dDrKqMLWBVCtcUBl5ptqXZdus5+fH4bvJO4TwAhP8lHy9FncKGd/5OqITGB Xf5yu0w4k0Do4hWQMbFW2IrSnawANxn7z84+QSYOUUZdYd990yIoysswvVwAoUrYlTLj kV1vAiA+ZomReUtOke9/psR2rrce2OrvAlNyYVWmI5lKS+xkdR/dtj8psIgwSANvFJWL I51T131KKpuJnW811UJM5eommlTsQrYQKj+LXrNkFxubN02RzozqdbpJIUaAgqd7npK7 UpGA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/d/BiBLfLEwPOvF14pxlCJc6aaKCV4A3/CAkaJiFDzc=; b=QNsuSfm3mjBCZT/6OMVezx6/0yGGOrdPMVNNoI49l/q5jB5ctb53CdHzXyFIDuCiuW jYj4kTF+EJ0+YnMdGHl30h8kRHrhRnS6NbEc1q/+zpD/Y1GGUZK72gJ699nXCNLAtm22 DM3QwABqNBFRL3L//aAm5sgd8CAHEADkL7LuiLH2Alwcku6LV60sX0gzCLFH+iKSIXRn Bbl8nGSsrmJ4slGRTCn5BG6uhSv1cVdMPctaH1e4U672axawqp5ysKTPTLnO1GeNB9ya otxFuqy7l4uIcbNptGYyT34lgzhXjP7hSd/2omwEk8VAkNHXM4JRCrDffuR2fyyO1yHS TbeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532c1ae7G/BJSo/C8J/VF5xGO5Jrv/7LevXnYBJeohGECcWUeaZ/ +aXDnXu1z/s1qYugTFpso46HFUlYPj8peA4bQC8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzXnTXMl6ia30WPgzFj60qHWQ45ZBbCpYnP2UBiAX5lf9alQDEdu1OnXf6oLDsr6bIZPh1FfxZt/pTBgcEZlA0=
X-Received: by 2002:aca:ab08:: with SMTP id u8mr9975oie.74.1599079709790; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com> <808181205.131590.1599043971572@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMAwvmu5FM=R=_z37ekybHycjrz4RyNZBb3ThRFwU3XQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <597003237.420857.1599076554610@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <597003237.420857.1599076554610@email.ionos.com>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:47:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCTTfPNxmXrM2qQf-UDCz+ef0w7X_FnkA44+xmVH_s+aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
Cc: draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011d6b405ae5ac298"
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: ted.ietf@gmail.com, barryleiba@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, superuser@gmail.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20200902204832.393AB3A0EFC@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 13:48:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/3RYs0_pz0Qd3RlVocTva11Abfaw>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 20:48:32 -0000

Hi Timothy,

That change would not match the rest of the document, because it does
change the IANA considerations.  Given our previous conversations, I assume
you mean by this that you oppose the changes.  I think the clearest way to
register that opposition is simply to oppose publication. Barry and the
IESG will have to determine which is the consensus position.

If I have misunderstood you, I would be happy to hear how to reconcile the
proposed text below with the rest of the text in RFC 3405 and this document.

regards,

Ted HArdie

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 12:55 PM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
wrote:

> >Is that right?
>
>
> The first thing I would change in your draft is from this:
>
> 3.  IANA Considerations
>
>    This entire document is updated instructions to IANA.
>
>
> To this:
> 3.  IANA Considerations
>
>    This update does not change the IANA Considerations in RFC 3405
>
>  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03#section-3>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email