IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Wed, 02 September 2020 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id D19D93A0EB9; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 03:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676343A0EB8; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 03:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bXl3Mk5idIhH; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 03:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFDCE3A0EB7; Wed, 2 Sep 2020 03:52:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw09.schlund.de ([10.72.72.55]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus004 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MEVeQ-1kNoev35DO-00G32e; Wed, 02 Sep 2020 12:52:51 +0200
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 06:52:51 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Cc: draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <808181205.131590.1599043971572@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev19
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Wy2fWL/qzuHCC9qmxWpt6fIjHFeikXhxUQOmP6JadIVsdfmzLxS Yjj9AHmnO31Ngi1ax26pruQ1jBD9LtXGiCzWbCj863UPxCEY334h3AzupK5svZepjpJ4tBe NPiFiaAsAoAiqLRa2O1NCySZP0BLNre2zOOkcCodBvich8wlS/O+LmOdYVoblHA4pQhEXkr cv764v3TFLwI17iL+JXBA==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:Od+F+7U5/NQ=:XV6+Y6bo7z6O7FoyBG6WGX NKGVriH5RPnVpUO+Og9iEayZKqLEh6bwy5zTzGziZZveD3LELIuplEl/ry+0pl7qi+a24xfK7 Tp0BBYCEXNXn4ej3Bpe3R6ff1pczpCi5CHMoRvyBSlOaj7z0SqX1x4P4Hjs6dN9oM0ecDUzQN IDjI/2oXvoMgh1UTuhuKCSqd+RFEkSp+FOGOBAPGZZgXkuEK660OkoG7S68pcd0pbErP88Hte cm5K9vF1CEJguiTv8HpxApF6xB/vLbJQpo1J6o+pgElQlM+MQX8fp+RzaZ+AhlxGdy2Cbyh9r vYYh0kLAN4YLUYlCkKGJFCxug9j82smdCEG8GGP4QDiREEUj6JDLxF1RA7gjobBRwyxp+9xZG pJmOHZzwctkJNILoyRSlUk/LVMq1j3y8VTV24AzSEKGo273eGA03oZ1lk5PXNNmAJ7iP9KP51 fHWOJzyLp9uJQ0RCGoQ6DGBrJK2yN6mmB9fp6fMrVuqhuO58LB/gEj4n8URB0K9pVr4mQvLfN JeFzKc7bpcuAn4tun86R182/OhMgCgr/pVBZuqK3OG9SZbJmW4Rf+6R3r7oXKeOWpcKcFjivB 2h97da/Z2agK37vkdrwszkp3Oc6W8oA5L6fvwGHFSX1TW+GiM/iOVtsQBkP8VFcQnB0YKIEys yKmt+86/FNiBKfWYKXCEEAOBL3cXyluZEHkinAVC6yJImpERw0qkv522m7mxKlP1UMAW2tBEs srGupb8F7yACCW8kzxRaZoks/aoGcOn7+GN3gAMRSriWPtpVm3eQjkONMLLiAjBeftWceRQhU Hq08RsVBrglrRpE+8bSRrs2ucCYHAduodVqw7AZ493HKdFrS0dw5CHJ/ksGdEvhgeZB6UfO
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: ted.ietf@gmail.com, barryleiba@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20200902105256.D19D93A0EB9@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 03:52:56 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/h2sHDP2AVgNfnc2SumTImC9lTFA>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2020 10:52:57 -0000

>>This draft doesn't replace the entire IANA Considerations section of RFC 3405, but rather amends it.
 
Oh, ok, because the draft literally says "This entire document is updated instructions to IANA."
 
 
>>This draft could spell out each of those edits precisely, or just replace all of Section 3.1.1 with a new set of text..
 
And it should.  There is no legitimate reason not to.  
 
 
>>... seems equivalent and unambiguous to me.
 
No surprise here.  Maybe the IESG isn't a good fit for you.  As a matter of fact, if I were Barry I would drop sponsorship of this draft for all the reasons above. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
On 09/02/2020 1:49 AM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com> wrote:
 
 
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 8:58 AM Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> wrote:
>While it's certainly possible to add such guidance now, this update is
>very narrowly targeted to fix a serious problem, and I would not want
>debate about additional text to get in the way of that.
 
And doesn't using this draft as an update of the entire IANA considerations section effectively remove any means of registration through the mailing lists provided in that same section??  
 
This draft doesn't replace the entire IANA Considerations section of RFC 3405, but rather amends it.  That is, after this is published, to get the full IANA Considerations for BCP 65, you would read RFC 3405 and then apply this document as a sort of "patch".  That's what we mean when we say "RFC Y updates RFC X", which will be the end result here.
 
The specific effect of this document when published is to amend Section 3.1.1 of RFC 3405 such that instead of saying "registered under the IETF URI tree", it becomes "a registered permanent URI scheme", and then take "tree" out of the next sentence, and rename the section to something more appropriate.  This draft could spell out each of those edits precisely, or just replace all of Section 3.1.1 with a new set of text, but it's such a small change that what's here seems equivalent and unambiguous to me.
 
-MSK
-- last-call mailing list last-call@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email