IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Tue, 08 September 2020 17:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: expand-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@virtual.ietf.org
Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 51E8B3A0B8B; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:37:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xfilter-draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCAF3A0B87; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:37:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13lzL4uDb3TB; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB56F3A0B76; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 10:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.16.1/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 088HbWHf069410 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 12:37:34 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1599586655; bh=p88MxJtpq3nwMuw6d4vjR2hei5lidAr3lGeBw7iTmQI=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=PfHREi9xUxcpjy8NqAfRgz230BXNt4YNHLO6HVjvLHstXzo95YuNX9ZufqqzRFwi+ mohNkCtwXgWe9z7aV9mIm1+M+a+hZcIrLTTa2fvS+KtZKfeV72fVU1bxW2hNV/aGco HA7C6s8a5otjvWSTTrejxWMekuNh12PbcMTGUXfw=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged) claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <93E4AA86-9CF4-4635-9E95-2A40C62E026B@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_53C5B5EF-C9A3-4024-A1D2-97FBC65DFDB7"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\))
Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:37:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <78D63CAD-1598-4973-9393-368E708BD354@akamai.com>
Cc: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>, "draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org" <draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update.all@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
References: <159893058662.23844.17177953972396775177@ietfa.amsl.com> <1066090379.166058.1598958286518@email.ionos.com> <CALaySJJaUDysmd+MFtQY1EfxjhVTq9sxEbQa6tf6Wy8g_3ERiA@mail.gmail.com> <674529702.175704.1598975928192@email.ionos.com> <CAL0qLwYajVR-MDHdnFzY-n4Rqzur4GHBpmQL63YBz2b74Bqa1g@mail.gmail.com> <808181205.131590.1599043971572@email.ionos.com> <CA+9kkMAwvmu5FM=R=_z37ekybHycjrz4RyNZBb3ThRFwU3XQFQ@mail.gmail.com> <d56b7ab8-52f7-c0bc-3c68-d7893c903be2@gmail.com> <916398430.283512.1599128074641@email.ionos.com> <9C86A277-47EA-47D8-8B09-1236BFDD1530@nostrum.com> <80653043.461504.1599148969376@email.ionos.com> <1541395114.285974.1599580192738@email.ionos.com> <78D63CAD-1598-4973-9393-368E708BD354@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1)
Resent-From: alias-bounces@ietf.org
Resent-To: ted.ietf@gmail.com, superuser@gmail.com, barryleiba@computer.org, barryleiba@gmail.com, spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com, dispatch@ietf.org
Resent-Message-Id: <20200908173751.51E8B3A0B8B@ietfa.amsl.com>
Resent-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 10:37:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dispatch/Saj1fDZJVLxRWCjNMFj91juP1tY>
Subject: Re: [dispatch] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-hardie-dispatch-rfc3405-update-03
X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List <dispatch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dispatch/>
List-Post: <mailto:dispatch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch>, <mailto:dispatch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:37:51 -0000


> On Sep 8, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
> 
> Does anyone else feel this way? I am opposed.
>  
> It *appears* that this change removes the requirement for proper URI’s, or at least moves the responsibility to IANA, which is hired staff.

I continue to oppose any approach that removes the requirement that the URI scheme itself go through an expert review. It seems appropriate that such review happen at the time of scheme registration (as opposed to the time of requesting inclusion in uri.arpa).  The requirement for permanent registration of the scheme gives us that.

There may be other ways to achieve the same thing, but they would almost certain require more complicated specification changes than simply saying “The scheme MUST be permanently registered”.

Ben.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email