IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 17 November 2020 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491AA3A109F for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HM8RRnO12tz8 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E7973A10A2 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id f7so10501669vsh.10 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=guIGV1HW/qWkr+jvnt9eISWZGJ5wRGZuuyo60QkATqY=; b=Z8UqHGL5YRU9nBgMrukpHAWgXS/88tQe+mJt/MnJIDv6Y0k3saaqWymuwEVfyrYvXR sp2QT0ZcFOabJ2v4DbxLAKPz5L9TT6lMMP82xDI3idQRn14b6HAS6L0HOrjdGuENPztx 6DSkgBH651c0LKBO9nbonAeXA2Epb+20I7Q1TPsEBfYZAQKqpGIlFEP8r3r3cnNtoZcM gS6jutvuc3AY9SVMlW7i6t1rykSi2ydd5e3FDIX2XfhO/Yyka64XSHxQhyGAqdP9GwsV CnEIponOXrHgGxSWtzapVVz2nfJGzS9Rq5qBptoVc/LmiU76phw8SdhBdr3K+qiaGeq4 SAUg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=guIGV1HW/qWkr+jvnt9eISWZGJ5wRGZuuyo60QkATqY=; b=L4lfELrFj/0ktbXAcBgCnU45i1G6HtlYaCzOg7S+vnOAv09s8u7HLpg40FwK1wfQVZ 0vY+GCxDKcbNWMliw7lTuL5H0PtGBRBo4AwdN+8Gg6b65zUk+ENgynr2J+saSAFOuuYx RJB8KA39ZhEaT8FDTcl7iW13dVyMIJqLjTVQEr5NjGQfYvmjn/ELPJ4XN+GJ98uNGvoZ m2OayOlH41yQvAqre5AplpBsSkkHlpTorbzf/nyUAFMExJmku9qwf46YX7OGy6KGjvKM GRJqLZVyb08ZKMDuVmh95U68aL1mT9r8gZd9wA3q4uVg+6Rnkle3XhpAB3LNG0G3JzU/ NAAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310x4H0GWs7GXuXY06sMuok/iNCEs3ag9vVjDJd2NVHLbZX7Eiz Hb6WA0spDIQPuUdyEbN5WIFFwZpK8/3rP0RoN2A=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwHT1hDsnW3uhhVJDJBsBG0BtejmV2CfW7DyuS+IJOY68nIN9aqPnjdXu69TK4NkcKb34Ckk++DgywufZjkZiY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:ec10:: with SMTP id d16mr10533967vso.33.1605596073588; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADyWQ+F9zJuMoWJV7Rp3fVjESdB4N4dE-AjJjh82Satd6br-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <801158ba-fcef-1bf3-497a-89e08c0005ec@dcrocker.net> <CADyWQ+FMfFeaOR8nBzSSZagp_msoDz9LfWfz-iZ+hKGgycWAOw@mail.gmail.com> <9BAE8F43-9B78-4352-A111-9549B7C46EDB@bluepopcorn.net> <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 22:54:20 -0800
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbD6UPsgxFui8Vt4g2+7vWUWuKu55UBpkuwcHgUc=4aAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net>
Cc: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>, IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000009e7a8f05b447f7c5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/-7ACiwQ8UeQLdNL7qn67sPqTnuk>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 06:54:36 -0000

If the meeting were to be held, who (besides Jim) was planning to attend?

-MSK, ART AD

On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 10:46 PM Murray S. Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to you
> shortly.
>
> -MSK, ART AD
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2020 at 4:38 PM Jim Fenton <fenton@bluepopcorn.net> wrote:
>
>> So what’s the conclusion on this? I still see the dmarc meeting on the
>> agenda page, but without any agenda or meeting materials (unlike virtually
>> every other WG meeting).
>>
>> -Jim
>>
>> On 13 Nov 2020, at 12:26, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>
>>
>> Dave
>>
>> It's the latter.   Alexey and I are quite fine with running the meeting,
>> that was part of our conversation.
>>
>> tim
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 3:23 PM Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/2020 10:40 AM, Tim Wicinski wrote:
>>> > During the chairs call this morning we were discussing the upcoming
>>> > meeting.  Now Seth has a conflict with the meeting time that can't be
>>> > altered.   Since work items have been progressing rather well
>>> recently,
>>> > and the editors are in positing, we discussed canceling the meeting.
>>> We
>>> > wanted to get some feedback from the working group.
>>> >
>>> > Here is a lightweight agenda Seth put together.  Should we 1) have a
>>> > meeting around these topics;  2) discuss other topics or 3) cancel the
>>> > meeting and keep moving along.
>>>
>>>
>>> Four days before a scheduled, rare meeting, it's being canceled because
>>> one of its 3 chairs can't attend?
>>>
>>> Or because it has suddenly been realized that the meeting won't be
>>> useful?
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> d/
>>> --
>>> Dave Crocker
>>> Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>> bbiw.net
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmarc mailing list
>> dmarc@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email