IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 17 November 2020 19:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4424C3A1588; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:35:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Nps57VdmfOX3; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E95A3A1585; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:35:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.0.109] (c-24-130-62-181.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.130.62.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 0AHJd24Y011238 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:39:02 -0800
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>, dmarc-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
References: <CADyWQ+F9zJuMoWJV7Rp3fVjESdB4N4dE-AjJjh82Satd6br-tQ@mail.gmail.com> <801158ba-fcef-1bf3-497a-89e08c0005ec@dcrocker.net> <CADyWQ+FMfFeaOR8nBzSSZagp_msoDz9LfWfz-iZ+hKGgycWAOw@mail.gmail.com> <9BAE8F43-9B78-4352-A111-9549B7C46EDB@bluepopcorn.net> <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Priority: 2 (High)
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <d862f3f5-d127-f10f-8860-8875d8b3b9e5@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 11:35:24 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL0qLwagPQrfBZS+YgJJaPWr161vPz3cLHQ8Ltqa=dutMB6mtA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/Np6xmXprcPdDHljDKK1jjhHlCko>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF 109 possible agenda/session discussion
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:35:32 -0000

On 11/16/2020 10:46 PM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> I'm discussing this with the chairs and they or I will get back to you 
> shortly.


Forgive me, but this is all a bit nuts.

Very few days before the scheduled session, we get a query about 
canceling it, though the query also included a fresh, 'lightweight' 
agenda.

A couple of responses are posted, stating a preference for cancellation, 
with no immediate responses choosing having the meeting (though today, 
some have).

We are now less than 12 hours from the scheduled time and still have not 
received a definitive decision by the chairs.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email