IETF Logo Mail Archive

[dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Mon, 10 August 2020 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0FE3A0B4A for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:10:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5wsIaf79C-4k for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B16013A0A97 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:10:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.43.69] ([172.58.19.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 07AJDKZa011740 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:13:30 -0700
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
To: IETF DMARC WG <dmarc@ietf.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <e42ceb0e-e52c-8dbe-4bf1-825f94670d80@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 12:10:30 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/ICObTYYO7cxNDeQjW1PxMgssTUE>
Subject: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 19:10:52 -0000

Folks,

I was quite surprised -- at the level of astonished -- to see the 
pushback on the Author header-field proposal, since it is such a simple 
and straightforward mechanism.

I'd like to ask for clarity from the group on both concerns about it and 
desires for it.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status