Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 15 August 2020 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3357A3A0803 for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.849
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.849 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7WCrdlNYFBWH for <dmarc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4517A3A07F6 for <dmarc@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:35:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id 07FKcU5U031263 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:38:37 -0700
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
References: <20200815194847.115A81E9D9F2@ary.local>
Cc: dmarc@ietf.org
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <2f145705-5ca5-4661-9515-1f56bc125d4f@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 13:35:39 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20200815194847.115A81E9D9F2@ary.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/h5oaCn8coJ7he0X02lfjM4Y-4rI>
Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] draft-crocker-dmarc-author-00 ?
X-BeenThere: dmarc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Domain-based Message Authentication, Reporting, and Compliance \(DMARC\)" <dmarc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmarc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc>, <mailto:dmarc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:35:53 -0000

On 8/15/2020 12:48 PM, John Levine wrote:
>> Also, I'm sorry to hear that the wg isn't capable of discussing two
>> drafts at the same time.
> I'm pretty sure that my opinions about -author and -sender would be the same
> even if they'd been published a year apart.


John -- your response is oddly orthongonal to my comment.

My comment was not about your opinion of either of the drafts but of 
your impatience with considering one you don't like.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net