Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com> Wed, 09 December 2015 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <sgundave@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE0B1A6F61 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:18:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v4ucBaXLimUN for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:18:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100AE1A9251 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 08:17:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=583; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1449677856; x=1450887456; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=KL6Ye2aFqXSRMKETm0bxMTiX1vuMWy2KKiYvRTzoMko=; b=IXp1f4vlHx5HNg8Jl1Jrj7DtERJFO8naDqcjmrL4llDDCqQiuTQsSudr g+V51s/D19RVJYwS3519VOfP8R7XCa7P/S9TfK8I8HH6UQ3hpz9bjMZ73 o+dzTvQvBbf2/hsZTvhtyCSPkrvVZ7+KZ1TagZgHx09zAYqACv+jzFF1r Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AgBQBqU2hW/40NJK1egzqBR71RgWKGDwKBJzkTAQEBAQEBAYEKhDUBAQMBHR1ECwIBCDYQMiUCBAEtiAwIv3oBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBG4ZVhH2JQAEElmkBjUKQGoxpASMBP4QEhWSBBwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,404,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="216235117"
Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 09 Dec 2015 16:17:35 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tB9GHZj2014270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:17:35 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-007.cisco.com (173.36.7.17) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:17:34 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-007.cisco.com ([173.36.7.17]) by XCH-ALN-007.cisco.com ([173.36.7.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:17:34 -0600
From: "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" <sgundave@cisco.com>
To: "pierrick.seite@orange.com" <pierrick.seite@orange.com>, Mingui Zhang <zhangmingui@huawei.com>, "Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de" <Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de>, "dmm@ietf.org" <dmm@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
Thread-Index: AQHRMp0cQdKE7abgg0KfJqSeQzrnVw==
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:17:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D28D92BC.1FA877%sgundave@cisco.com>
References: <tencent_3D1069622110DFAF00D8DB64@qq.com> <CAKcc6Ae9McC_rrfv2mbvY1DdxO-Vj0exjjD0YPoPfD_sRi0c3A@mail.gmail.com> <56617290.40408@gmail.com> <19259_1449227196_566173BC_19259_8875_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7116126FB9@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <05C81A773E48DD49B181B04BA21A342A3865BC2777@HE113484.emea1.cds.t-internal.com> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E78725780C@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <4928_1449651744_5667EE20_4928_1792_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7116127D8E@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <4552F0907735844E9204A62BBDD325E78725792F@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <13235_1449654325_5667F835_13235_974_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7116127EB1@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
In-Reply-To: <13235_1449654325_5667F835_13235_974_1_81C77F07008CA24F9783A98CFD706F7116127EB1@OPEXCLILM22.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.32.246.210]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <1958E57BE94367478AA15FE259A20079@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/5Q5D_2KyubX59mg51xCaoPXiT3A>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:18:09 -0000

>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Do you mean that using DSL and LTE together is a BBF trademark? ...
>>> come on. :-).. anyway, I don't care about using another example... why
>>> not WiFi and LTE... is it ok? Is there any SDO which claims
>>>exclusivity on this
>>use-case ;-) ?

> Ok, no problem.

Now, I guess, it significantly improves of odds of some new protocol that
folks plan to define to be adopted as THE solution for the target SDO :)

FWIW, we will absolutely make sure this extension stays relevant to any
pairs of access technologies, with no restrictions.


Sri