IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 02 December 2015 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CA1ACEA5 for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:02:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.15
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.15 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_65=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CZ9_F7aksdLJ for <dmm@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0561ACEA0 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qgeb1 with SMTP id b1so41630989qge.1 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:02:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w0xBRp1pCzwp0rStUhEk1yAFzZCqdwAEvdWtLN4RLa8=; b=NajHIM14Adm1z9Lxuv7nJ/9IIOvLzsW7br2zXuqltUykesNVsZnK2scIjK4EETVly+ CvW3I0xlE+KCO25OrIoyXF5e8wHMat+ZupYZ3V7jwwzCU04BukxTbrhrUPOIs7SnyJXb JAua/vHeWe3/iKk24hGkYfZGoD78XMiyRfhCILgMUY8y8JLiWNeBF+cMFli4dkZupCoY Rf+/J/1J50GRukaGCTmL/UlpSWnwmdgdp18M31Wkw22tnedCFQMS2vrh6ORKk+3ZWmfq W8O2YTDD3hGA47bSk312EiZKWQkDucog2EfW5wewGQkdjCcFccrB8HL8uE+YRiZE7N+o BjPQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.98.213 with SMTP id o79mr6224117qge.31.1449082943740; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:02:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.55.136.198 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:02:23 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <565E3E35.9020707@gmail.com>
References: <tencent_3D1069622110DFAF00D8DB64@qq.com> <CAKcc6Ae9McC_rrfv2mbvY1DdxO-Vj0exjjD0YPoPfD_sRi0c3A@mail.gmail.com> <565E3E35.9020707@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 13:02:23 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcf4ocbmpW2uOu3grBgceX-qJyHdVj3Ws-Mp3SVcXu94fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmm/HS-mpcQruIx2UGIz849qUKkSawU>
Cc: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management Working Group <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmm/>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:02:26 -0000

Hi Jouni,


On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an individual contributor I support the adoption of this I-D. MCoA is a
> feature that we still lack..
>

Are you sure?

MCoA is solved in Netext Flow Mobility draft,

draft-ietf-netext-pmipv6-flowmob-14

is the latest draft.

BTW there was an issue in WG adoption call in IETF 93 in Yokohama. The
chair asked only those who accept. The chair unfortunately did not ask
those who oppose.

As you know, if the chair wishes to ask a single question then the
right one is any opposes.

Regards,

Behcet
> The document itself still needs quite a bit of work. For example, I wonder
> if the caption for Figure 2 is correct. Also, Section 4.1. option fiels
> descriptions are somewhat broken it seems. And so on multiple small nits
> like unexpanded acronyms etc. However, these are mainly editorials. I have
> no problem with the technical solution.
>
> - Jouni
>
>
>
> 11/25/2015, 8:22 AM, Dapeng Liu kirjoitti:
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
>> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>> Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to
>> confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
>> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ------
>> Best Regards,
>> Dapeng&Jouni
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------
>> Best Regards,
>> Dapeng Liu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email