Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi,

I also support the adoption.

However, I have a slight concern.I find Figure 1 little too specific and 
it might mislead the audience.
Maybe the wording should be changed in order to emphasize that this is 
just an instance.
Or else, I think the use case should be dropped.
However, having an example would be extremely helpful in understanding. 
So I would suggest the former.

Regards,
IRU

On 12/4/2015 8:01 PM, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I support adoption.
>
> One little note: the -rg- in filename makes think of Research Group.  
> It would make sense to change the filename to avoid the use of -rg-, 
> if it's not too complicated.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 25/11/2015 17:22, Dapeng Liu a écrit :
>> Hello all,
>>
>> In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:
>> draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02
>> Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to
>> confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.
>> Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> ------
>> Best Regards,
>> Dapeng&Jouni
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>>
>> ------
>> Best Regards,
>> Dapeng Liu
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>