Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

Hi Dirk,

> -----Message d'origine-----

> De : Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de [mailto:Dirk.von-Hugo@telekom.de]

> Envoyé : mardi 8 décembre 2015 11:06

> À : SEITE Pierrick IMT/OLN; dmm@ietf.org

> Cc : alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com

> Objet : RE: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-

> 02

>

> Hi Pierrick,

> Thank you for the clarification!

> May I recommend then to exchange also the multiple occurrences of RG in the

> draft text by - why not MAG?

>

Sure, this doc must not refer to RG, MAG should be used instead . Thanks

> Your approach which I think of as mainly opting towards future mobility

> management systems with multiple connections (e.g. backhauling of

> vehicular/nomadic access nodes or MRs) otherwise might be interpreted in a

> misleading direction ...

>

> Having said this I also would appreciate to replace the expression 'hybrid' by

> 'multi-link' or 'multi-connected'. For an BBF-related aggregated access bundling

> often called 'hybrid access' (see e.g. BANANA activity) there are - as Mingui

> already pointed out - other solution proposals available which consider in detail the

> specific existing gaps.

>

Agreed. Let's use IETF terminology as per RFC4885 and talk about multihoming instead.

> IMHO I would also opting to replace the use case DSL+LTE by a more general one

> e.g. multiple wireless and cellular links as WiFi+LTE or LTE(provided by operator x)

> + LTE(provided by operator y) or even LTE+future 5G air interface ...

> ;-)

>

Even if I do not see why Wifi+LTE is more general than DSL+LTE,  I have no problem with using another example :-) we will change the example in next revision.

Thanks,

Pierrick

> Thanks a lot!

>

> Best Regards

> Dirk

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

> pierrick.seite@orange.com<mailto:pierrick.seite@orange.com>

> Sent: Freitag, 4. Dezember 2015 12:07

> To: Alexandre Petrescu; dmm

> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-

> multihoming-02

>

> Good point... moreover, "rg" means nothing here...

>

> > -----Message d'origine-----

> > De : dmm [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Alexandre

> > Petrescu Envoyé : vendredi 4 décembre 2015 12:02 À : dmm Objet : Re:

> > [DMM] Call for adoption confirmation: draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-

> > 02

> >

> > Hi,

> >

> > I support adoption.

> >

> > One little note: the -rg- in filename makes think of Research Group.

> > It would make sense to change the filename to avoid the use of -rg-, if it's not

> too complicated.

> >

> > Alex

> >

> > Le 25/11/2015 17:22, Dapeng Liu a écrit :

> > > Hello all,

> > >

> > > In IETF94, we initiated the call for adoption for the draft:

> > > draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

> > > <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02>:

> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-seite-dmm-rg-multihoming-02

> > > Seems have got sufficient support during the meeting. We'd like to

> > > confirm the call for adoption in the mailing list for 2 weeks.

> > > Please send your opinion and comments to the list before December 9.

> > >

> > >

> > > Thanks,

> > > ------

> > > Best Regards,

> > > Dapeng&Jouni

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > >

> > > ------

> > > Best Regards,

> > > Dapeng Liu

> > >

> > >

> > > _______________________________________________

> > > dmm mailing list

> > > dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>

> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

> > >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > dmm mailing list

> > dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>

> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

>

> ______________________________________________________________________

> ___________________________________________________

>

> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations

> confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou

> copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le

> signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages

> electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si

> ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

>

> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged

> information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or

> copied without authorisation.

> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this

> message and its attachments.

> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been

> modified, changed or falsified.

> Thank you.

>

> _______________________________________________

> dmm mailing list

> dmm@ietf.org<mailto:dmm@ietf.org>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorization.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange shall not be liable if this message was modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.