IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00

Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net> Wed, 31 August 2011 04:00 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
X-Original-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DE021F8C3D for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:00:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.151, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFM0s6IPP7Wx for <dnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909C221F8AF2 for <dnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FE859807D; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=mattmccutchen.net; h=subject:from :to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= mattmccutchen.net; b=TzTez+IDB6NNDsOaQql6tlN3LNMACfIhjWFD4nh6Ffv kAtwWKc7c5oCTlu0EgflKqeoH/qN9wczBZBd2EyojC+rcdFVjbx2sAvbBv9VJjxG M/jXghMZ9/s7DMiGFqNkGh9p5hiXxZJuviNs+LHTWGGzQWSSxDAKcKuwN7j0KaNg =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mattmccutchen.net; h= subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to:references:content-type :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; s= mattmccutchen.net; bh=iApwSYo0QcuV5TXRJE4EMX+clgg=; b=H388jffwrB DS5oE2YdqyF4de3B6mgG8Sek28wXtmBs0x7rlyT8Pp9GkUUB9Xb/6QdOvOJbU0nE gmpPVrsqgkyR1hoc6OlhdLqtNGfqruLMMfpRp/EQg2Kiv4k6IqcNubQ7haK7T+DD 5xVGazCkJOBbpxnasP9ZE//ULso9kEv7E=
Received: from [192.168.1.39] (pool-96-231-14-14.washdc.east.verizon.net [96.231.14.14]) (using SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: matt@mattmccutchen.net) by homiemail-a6.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E2B2598077; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 21:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matt McCutchen <matt@mattmccutchen.net>
To: Matthew Dempsky <matthew@dempsky.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:01:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CANKkrzE3P-S_djGXReFz8dDGi6BtzD75oXw7azY6DBiaBNqW9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20110830162134.GB84494@shinkuro.com> <CAMbvoa+nh5k8eOA-XRwBD5oxm17+=Q4gCagq0OBS5OEQX=g1sw@mail.gmail.com> <20110831031256.GA98758@shinkuro.com> <CANKkrzE3P-S_djGXReFz8dDGi6BtzD75oXw7azY6DBiaBNqW9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3
Message-ID: <1314763320.2774.5.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Paul Vixie <vixie@isc.org>, dnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dnsext] afasterinternet.com trial and draft-vandergaast-edns-client-subnet-00
X-BeenThere: dnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS Extensions working group discussion list <dnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsext>, <mailto:dnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 04:00:32 -0000

On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 20:47 -0700, Matthew Dempsky wrote:
> I suggested in April 2010 that part of the EDNS0 option code space be
> reserved for private use, but it received very little feedback
> (positive response from Colm MacCárthaigh, slightly negative from Paul
> Vixie, and some meta discussion about how strictly IANA follows its
> instructions on allocating numbers):
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dnsext/current/msg07768.html
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dempsky-edns0-options-for-private-use-00

>From the peanut gallery, having a private use range seems like a
no-brainer.  What is Paul suggesting: don't test EDNS0 options at all
before publishing the RFC?

-- 
Matt

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email