Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ

Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 24 November 2019 19:39 UTC

Return-Path: <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2473F120088 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:39:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e8rM6MtTf_AY for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x330.google.com (mail-ot1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0543120047 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:39:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x330.google.com with SMTP id c19so10692352otr.11 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:39:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bDbbgBKTOJbVLvFncUyCddzMdqH7klOgiduytuokRc4=; b=pdOAlZZ+dCb5a8RH37UgX2fEL82YiqabXijN1FL8Uh/d/g6+3VbmkF6eTdv2AaL2pW kCRTJiT1WVvk3AQhX2C2aJ+KQ/tDH7dPv3qBbYiCjRhqnU+Je6Zjxw85AP0AXiiULvd/ QCefm9bVSqTNkE4/uZQhrKf3N4vFytBoPVHkMmEOFegCLLrSMWqSFgAzYZllRaZ4wIJI UH54E/Xox24AdzDvWFRJJqe12+YzvX2CvM4n6J62qAN4ZLzV2PokGsvjvuLomuOGhsM/ EDOYw0R0eyg17t9MJIhs8HfYqMdbzlbgwiUyN36JNl58Pgxb3SA6CjAXT1gk814uNWwm U+ng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=bDbbgBKTOJbVLvFncUyCddzMdqH7klOgiduytuokRc4=; b=LRYLZBb/yw2qy9be0HGHGuGdosgSJiTOG2X7m7Z1lOJRpIVKIUVs+xuAW8POn4YOaG u8L9tCV5CsELWMw1A/ceiilPnEoO/QYM3KQuIRglhM2iCuFcJ48XJCPJtMEGzZlqSAoQ f+rDy+68D7JFPizqKM/9b8heu04w7JSw2P7mXselFZM2ij+q5wcUKrI8yHyECS9o894M QeMARIwUYLJgyD6MFwK+tWzd1XmaDconeIAH1QEjTDg5QayByhyBwG6LliGOevkWDO5T 0GX59rhIltNoSrMZJdgrzDJ2dRPTQJnsJ35vI1oaz3g/33gATM5v+VKKKNS8/cwYGt2X NRoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVKzZu8pdhJOrYaXgSHCRvcIHQ8BdHHF6J8vQrKk5v+nZCCFfag /URNVhtYT2nOkribYYldSwXbWh9h8PQD3l4A7g2VOm2s
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz4NKIZeU2dFLoTpYyBU+7Q/M9h/UPR7KV57ayJU5vdlO6ts5p3wc8Iod3VWFdaqEKtQEf03bi7FOd1FFDNQSg=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:bb6:: with SMTP id 51mr18425450oth.158.1574624350845; Sun, 24 Nov 2019 11:39:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <3B27AE04-E436-44FA-A9A2-678A505D42F8@virtualized.org> <29301360-0B20-478F-A891-E25021EE86AC@fugue.com> <ea8be591-764e-e727-3d5a-95a571f28805@lisse.NA>
In-Reply-To: <ea8be591-764e-e727-3d5a-95a571f28805@lisse.NA>
From: Tim Wicinski <tjw.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 14:38:59 -0500
Message-ID: <CADyWQ+EuMCQHACPX7dyExhNSCnWun+PiCn1m9gza98cppEu3=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: dnsop <dnsop@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001648a905981ccde1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/3RgOM64nHVwad7HITN9_c0745GU>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 19:39:14 -0000

I can not speak for all DNSOP chairs, but this chair would prefer to not
repeat all those "fun" RFC6761 discussions,
as Mr. Conrad mentioned.

If the working group is missing a "fun" type of discussion, I am sure the
chairs can come up something suitably
entertaining.

Tim



On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 3:23 PM Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.na> wrote:

> There is a small chance that ISO might change this in the future, but as
> long as there are some excluded/user assigned ISO code elements left I
> too think letting the user assign the pseudo TLD(s) makes sense.
>
> Even though I like the .ZZ idea :-)-O
>
>
> el
>
> On 2019-11-22 20:45 , Ted Lemon wrote:
> > On Nov 22, 2019, at 1:33 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote:
> >> I don’t understand why one would need to pick ZZ (or any other user
> >> defined code) to mean by convention anything.  It doesn’t hurt
> >> anything, I just don’t see the point.
> >>
> >> I would turn the question around:
> >>
> >> Why not simply have an RFC that declares the user defined ISO 3166
> >> codes as the RFC 1918-space equivalent for the DNS and be done with
> >> it?  If people _really_ want to continue the bike shedding on a
> >> particular string, they still can, but the folks who want a string
> >> (or strings) that they can use for internal purposes without fear of
> >> it being delegated in some future round of new gTLDs can just get on
> >> with their lives.
> >
> > I agree completely.  The RFC that declares this should advise
> > potential users of these TLDs to use a random number to choose one of
> > the available names, so that the likelihood of a collision is at least
> > somewhat lessened in case of a future merger.  Locking it to .ZZ or
> > suggesting that people to pick based on preference creates a higher
> > likelihood of such collisions.
>
> --
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse          / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el@lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421                  /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>