IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ

"Nishal Goburdhan" <nishal@controlfreak.co.za> Fri, 22 November 2019 09:34 UTC

Return-Path: <nishal@controlfreak.co.za>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AD7120288 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:34:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qSyIoWNS8DNA for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jnb.controlfreak.co.za (jnb.controlfreak.co.za [196.10.53.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874C9120048 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 01:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.30.39] (unknown [102.132.161.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nishal@controlfreak.co.za) by jnb.controlfreak.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1F942E68E8 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:34:30 +0200 (SAST)
From: Nishal Goburdhan <nishal@controlfreak.co.za>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:34:28 +0200
X-Mailer: MailMate (1.13r5655)
Message-ID: <58977F7B-D7DB-4DF0-82ED-DA49BF34CF29@controlfreak.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <92EF6592-8801-4E58-B893-DDCF4F68934F@pch.net>
References: <CAHXf=0pOVM_MHypgL7uV88242ciBUXGpx6waUetxBbZhvth1gA@mail.gmail.com> <35F0456A-2BA5-4021-AA9D-A86889E74AE6@nohats.ca> <8a5833d5-192f-fdbf-2862-e3f144be80cc@nic.cz> <CAH1iCirfeaD5pJ1_Tm5PaATQ9_zmrj2PbSnPGyL8z40L-_z3nw@mail.gmail.com> <D7475E63-1047-4622-B7EE-DEEA1A891825@pch.net> <f4d32eb9-c073-463f-1914-bdc62ec372bf@time-travellers.org> <92EF6592-8801-4E58-B893-DDCF4F68934F@pch.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/DdBXZAg7ls656ZoQ4VqPdxBjQOs>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:34:35 -0000

On 22 Nov 2019, at 10:26, Bill Woodcock wrote:

> Again, this is an argument from principle rather than an argument 
> based on the specific case at hand.  I just think that we have a 
> well-established precedent that all two-letter TLDs are derived from 
> ISO 3166 Alpha-2, and it’s bad form to cross back over and start 
> poaching in their territory.

^^ this.

—n.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email