IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ

Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Thu, 21 November 2019 15:26 UTC

Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26571200F8 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:26:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qI5hFrQqw-Cz for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.pch.net (keriomail.pch.net [206.220.231.84]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 894DD1200DF for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:26:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Footer: cGNoLm5ldA==
Received: from [10.19.48.23] ([69.166.14.2]) (authenticated user woody@pch.net) by mail.pch.net (Kerio Connect 9.2.7 patch 3) with ESMTPSA (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits)) for dnsop@ietf.org; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:59 -0800
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A323D6A4-20C6-45AA-8F4C-DF07080F46C2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:25:47 -0800
References: <CAHXf=0pOVM_MHypgL7uV88242ciBUXGpx6waUetxBbZhvth1gA@mail.gmail.com> <35F0456A-2BA5-4021-AA9D-A86889E74AE6@nohats.ca> <8a5833d5-192f-fdbf-2862-e3f144be80cc@nic.cz> <CAH1iCirfeaD5pJ1_Tm5PaATQ9_zmrj2PbSnPGyL8z40L-_z3nw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "dnsop@ietf.org WG" <dnsop@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH1iCirfeaD5pJ1_Tm5PaATQ9_zmrj2PbSnPGyL8z40L-_z3nw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-Id: <D7475E63-1047-4622-B7EE-DEEA1A891825@pch.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/pGbgos7G6gzjz9BGDhhvhFWRGc4>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:26:03 -0000


> On Nov 21, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
> IMHO, there is *no* reason not to advance .zz

For the record, I think it’s a really bad idea to start re-purposing the ISO user-assigned codes.  Just as bad an idea as if they started re-purposing 1918 space.

                                -Bill

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email