IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ

Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl> Thu, 21 November 2019 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96299120048 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:55:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=gnwHZSSN; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl header.b=gnwHZSSN
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WE4e7f75IvaU for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:55:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5749120147 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:55:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix, from userid 58) id 9E00316231; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:25 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1574322925; bh=IYPNOiQleOUuDv3OHn1odm4xwthOcD3XIMWvlb2WOww=; h=To:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=gnwHZSSNAJxP/7rtNQlEdxWuilvPxSgZWMGX68iXla+8W0PPjt6EuU6HoDe1rUvF5 VQWQzTEg+v60ut+L12SMpPtdV/4cwx0x9F5I+tzdAixDsxj8kB/+I6n0rQuilWqi9Y CjjFaTl6/Y6sptvA6Op1n/n0pgFRfuQlqWd+TkkQ=
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [IPv6:2a04:b900::1:0:0:15]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274661622F for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:25 +0100 (CET)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=NLnetLabs.nl
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=jaap@NLnetLabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1574322925; bh=IYPNOiQleOUuDv3OHn1odm4xwthOcD3XIMWvlb2WOww=; h=To:Subject:From:In-reply-to:References:Date; b=gnwHZSSNAJxP/7rtNQlEdxWuilvPxSgZWMGX68iXla+8W0PPjt6EuU6HoDe1rUvF5 VQWQzTEg+v60ut+L12SMpPtdV/4cwx0x9F5I+tzdAixDsxj8kB/+I6n0rQuilWqi9Y CjjFaTl6/Y6sptvA6Op1n/n0pgFRfuQlqWd+TkkQ=
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAL7tOYg024827 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Received: from bela.nlnetlabs.nl (jaap@localhost) by bela.nlnetlabs.nl (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id xAL7tOtU024824 for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jaap@NLnetLabs.nl)
Message-Id: <201911210755.xAL7tOtU024824@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Authentication-Warning: bela.nlnetlabs.nl: jaap owned process doing -bs
To: IETF DNSOP WG <dnsop@ietf.org>
From: Jaap Akkerhuis <jaap@NLnetLabs.nl>
In-reply-to: <35F0456A-2BA5-4021-AA9D-A86889E74AE6@nohats.ca>
References: <CAHXf=0pOVM_MHypgL7uV88242ciBUXGpx6waUetxBbZhvth1gA@mail.gmail.com> <35F0456A-2BA5-4021-AA9D-A86889E74AE6@nohats.ca>
Comments: In-reply-to Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> message dated "Thu, 21 Nov 2019 15:26:44 +0800."
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-ID: <24822.1574322924.1@bela.nlnetlabs.nl>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:24 +0100
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (bela.nlnetlabs.nl [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 21 Nov 2019 08:55:25 +0100 (CET)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/5DL847UvB7H5Wh5hBKrelyP6A5s>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 07:55:28 -0000

 Paul Wouters writes:

 > 
 >
 >
 > > On Nov 21, 2019, at 15:18, Alexander Mayrhofer <alex.mayrhofer.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
 > > 
 > > 
 > > ..ZZ would remind me of long beards and loud motorcycles for the rest
 > > of my life.. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/ZZ_Top
 >
 > English speaking people can’t even agree on how to pronounce this name......
 >
 > Having an undelegated .zz is also not guaranteed to be free of security issues, for example if ICANN delegates .zzz there will be interesting typo attacks possible in this weird private space.
 >

The code zzz is also private space

 > Finally, I agree. People want something semantic and more pronounceable.

In what language? Furtherore, there are a sle of codes to choose
from. Currently the principle choice is wether one wants to use
these 'User Assigned' ISO codes.

	jaap

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email