Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA> Fri, 22 November 2019 20:23 UTC
Return-Path: <el@lisse.NA>
X-Original-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F1E120169 for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:23:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.233
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gXkd_UvhCzZt for <dnsop@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fra.omadhina.net (fra.omadhina.net [80.240.31.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B377012013A for <dnsop@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 12:23:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.8.108] (unknown [197.243.225.92]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fra.omadhina.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA34A7E0FC; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:23:35 +0000 (UTC)
Reply-To: el@lisse.NA
Cc: el@lisse.NA
References: <3B27AE04-E436-44FA-A9A2-678A505D42F8@virtualized.org> <29301360-0B20-478F-A891-E25021EE86AC@fugue.com>
To: dnsop@ietf.org
From: Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el@lisse.NA>
Organization: Dr Eberhard W Lisse
Message-ID: <ea8be591-764e-e727-3d5a-95a571f28805@lisse.NA>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:23:33 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <29301360-0B20-478F-A891-E25021EE86AC@fugue.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dnsop/oVzKj3eG9Sj9vs65V5kpVNV-LNQ>
Subject: Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ
X-BeenThere: dnsop@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF DNSOP WG mailing list <dnsop.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dnsop/>
List-Post: <mailto:dnsop@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop>, <mailto:dnsop-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 20:23:40 -0000
There is a small chance that ISO might change this in the future, but as long as there are some excluded/user assigned ISO code elements left I too think letting the user assign the pseudo TLD(s) makes sense. Even though I like the .ZZ idea :-)-O el On 2019-11-22 20:45 , Ted Lemon wrote: > On Nov 22, 2019, at 1:33 PM, David Conrad <drc@virtualized.org> wrote: >> I don’t understand why one would need to pick ZZ (or any other user >> defined code) to mean by convention anything. It doesn’t hurt >> anything, I just don’t see the point. >> >> I would turn the question around: >> >> Why not simply have an RFC that declares the user defined ISO 3166 >> codes as the RFC 1918-space equivalent for the DNS and be done with >> it? If people _really_ want to continue the bike shedding on a >> particular string, they still can, but the folks who want a string >> (or strings) that they can use for internal purposes without fear of >> it being delegated in some future round of new gTLDs can just get on >> with their lives. > > I agree completely. The RFC that declares this should advise > potential users of these TLDs to use a random number to choose one of > the available names, so that the likelihood of a collision is at least > somewhat lessened in case of a future merger. Locking it to .ZZ or > suggesting that people to pick based on preference creates a higher > likelihood of such collisions. -- Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar) el@lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell) PO Box 8421 / Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
- [DNSOP] On .ZZ Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Jared Mauch
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Paul Wouters
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Vladimír Čunát
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Brian Dickson
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Shane Kerr
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Erwin Lansing
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Paul Vixie
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Nishal Goburdhan
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Jaap Akkerhuis
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Bill Woodcock
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Roy Arends
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Matthew Pounsett
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Steve Crocker
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ David Conrad
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Ted Lemon
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [DNSOP] On .ZZ Tim Wicinski